(Q - mblond: when we hunt Father Méhus, we try to see which things are identical in order to effectively try to eliminate things which could seem a little purely literary.)<
/i>
MB: for example, between Father Méhus and then the fact of devoting himself solely to the enigmas with the specifications in hand, with Pierrette today, it is much more concise and much more concentrated than Father Méhus, but it They are the same, there are the same foundations, there are the same notions which are induced in them. Except that in Father Méhus it is very diluted.
(Q - mblond: okay, you see that more diluted in Father Méhus, you must be right because you have the solutions but seen from the outside for me it was the opposite, you see, that is to say that for me, when I look at the normal enigmas and I compare to Father Méhus, I say to myself, in Father Méhus, it's more concentrated, it's funny.) i>
MB: in fact the difference between Méhus and, well, the texts he published concerning me, my love of owls etc., all that is stuffing we will say, but the story of Father Méhus is interesting , already the one that was communicated to me, it was necessarily already retouched compared to the first draft, since allusions are made to contemporary things from the 90s, rap in particular, or things like that which, in the 70s didn't exist and so he had already retouched it a little bit, but not much.
On the other hand, we must consider that it is the basic text of the story, that is to say that at the time when he did that, really at the time when he wrote this text, he was 100% marketing consultant, he was 100% looking for a product to sell to his customers and he used 100% his technique to do mail order sales, that is to say sell a product by making the potential buyer want it. , by praising the qualities of the product, etc., so in fact it is diluted, it is to lead you to understand that it is a real treasure, that it has great value, that you have to look for it, etc. , so when he describes the character of Paul Acher who is passionate, who is obsessed with all this, in reality what is he doing? He does the work of a communicator who tries to instill in his reader this same desire and to lead his reader to become passionate in the same way that he says he was.
(Q - mblond: so I think we misunderstood each other because I wasn't talking about that part, I wasn't talking about the text, I was only talking about the riddles. )
MB: the riddles are indeed, they are the same riddles, but there you have them, written a little differently for some, and there you have it, yes, it's the same riddles, it's the same cache, it leads to the same place.
(Q - mblond: okay but there you go, and I find that it was only eh, I was only talking about the enigmas because the text well I understood that it was sales eh, but no, I was only talking about the texts…)
MB: it's not just sales, in the text, there's already everything I put in Pierrette, but it's diluted from diluted.
(Q - mblond: well listen that's it, it's information, I think that will please a lot of people...)
MB: so much the better, so much the better, so much the better.
MB: for example, between Father Méhus and then the fact of devoting himself solely to the enigmas with the specifications in hand, with Pierrette today, it is much more concise and much more concentrated than Father Méhus, but it They are the same, there are the same foundations, there are the same notions which are induced in them. Except that in Father Méhus it is very diluted.
(Q - mblond: okay, you see that more diluted in Father Méhus, you must be right because you have the solutions but seen from the outside for me it was the opposite, you see, that is to say that for me, when I look at the normal enigmas and I compare to Father Méhus, I say to myself, in Father Méhus, it's more concentrated, it's funny.) i>
MB: in fact the difference between Méhus and, well, the texts he published concerning me, my love of owls etc., all that is stuffing we will say, but the story of Father Méhus is interesting , already the one that was communicated to me, it was necessarily already retouched compared to the first draft, since allusions are made to contemporary things from the 90s, rap in particular, or things like that which, in the 70s didn't exist and so he had already retouched it a little bit, but not much.
On the other hand, we must consider that it is the basic text of the story, that is to say that at the time when he did that, really at the time when he wrote this text, he was 100% marketing consultant, he was 100% looking for a product to sell to his customers and he used 100% his technique to do mail order sales, that is to say sell a product by making the potential buyer want it. , by praising the qualities of the product, etc., so in fact it is diluted, it is to lead you to understand that it is a real treasure, that it has great value, that you have to look for it, etc. , so when he describes the character of Paul Acher who is passionate, who is obsessed with all this, in reality what is he doing? He does the work of a communicator who tries to instill in his reader this same desire and to lead his reader to become passionate in the same way that he says he was.
(Q - mblond: so I think we misunderstood each other because I wasn't talking about that part, I wasn't talking about the text, I was only talking about the riddles. )
MB: the riddles are indeed, they are the same riddles, but there you have them, written a little differently for some, and there you have it, yes, it's the same riddles, it's the same cache, it leads to the same place.
(Q - mblond: okay but there you go, and I find that it was only eh, I was only talking about the enigmas because the text well I understood that it was sales eh, but no, I was only talking about the texts…)
MB: it's not just sales, in the text, there's already everything I put in Pierrette, but it's diluted from diluted.
(Q - mblond: well listen that's it, it's information, I think that will please a lot of people...)
MB: so much the better, so much the better, so much the better.