(Q - ??: Mr Becker. Sorry, I can be heard. )
MB: Yes, Mr. Becker doesn't hear you very well considering his age, but he hears you.
(Q - ??: Yes, Good evening, this is the first time, I'm a new neat guy. So I listened to all the vocals that were available on Youtube. I'm starting to arrive on the Discord and so I had a question regarding this famous indication that you are going to release soon. Will this indication that you are going to release need to be deciphered or deciphered or is it rather another way of doing it? 'bring a new way of seeing things, and that as a result there will be absolutely no decryption or deciphering at all on this indication.)
MB: My little finger tells me that it should be quite poetic and that in matters of poetry every word has a meaning.
(Q - ??: Okay OK, very good perfect, thank you very much. )
MB: You will have a great time if you like reading, if you like words and if you are able to look for their meaning, you will have a great time.
(Q - Xavier D’Homan: Are we going to have something as long as the Bible?)
MB: No, it's not as long as the Bible. No, I limited myself to 25 chapters and 158 pages.
(Q - ??: Will it be interpretable by Michel de la Fontaine.)
MB: Has it ever happened that I could at one point say something that could not be interpreted?
(Q - Apollo: No, I'm talking about the poem and the words that will be used for this poem, will these words be interpretable? You know very well that we bicker over words, on pieces of sentences, and there it will be a massacre.)
MB: It will be eminently interpretable. I like the interpretations, that's the goal. I look forward to the idea of ??what you will be able to concoct after reading my few lines.
(Q - Harvester: Well, we're back for 30 years.)
MB: Well that’s not sure. And parenthetically, I am 100% honest. Please listen carefully to what I tell you, I am 100% honest when I tell you, the owl may be discovered next week or it may not be discovered again in 30 or 40 years. Both are possible [Brouhaha] Ah but it's painful, you're always putting the responsibility on my side. In fact, the discovery of the owl relies on your ability to understand, interpret, imagine, it no longer depends on me. Given everything I've thrown at you, by God, I've thrown a lot at you. Well today it's on your side, it's on your side that it's happening. Either someone really has the trigger and says, Oh God no, that's it, all of a sudden I understand and it's going to go very quickly, or for reasons which for me remain a little obscure I Admit it, no one is considering the good possibility and in 30 years, we are still there. Well, not me, but you.
(Q - Xavier D'Homan: Ah, it's still scary when you think about it, when you say yeah, maybe as soon as someone comes out with the Additional Indication, it maybe someone will say oh that's it, I found it and it's crazy all the same.)
MB: Yes, but it’s scary for me too, huh. You shouldn't think that you are the only ones who are freaking out, eh. I say to myself, I talk to them, I tell them things, I throw things at them wow, a little bit heavy, they see, they don't see, they dodge, they digest. Three days later, we no longer talk about it. A day before, we are still talking about it, 3 days later, we are no longer talking about it. For me, it's scary too, eh, how I can do it, how I can do it so that my words, so that what I'm trying to say survives, is printed, impacts the reasoning of the owls, it's no more obvious to you, to me, huh?
(Q - Xavier D'Homan: Yeah but Michel, you agree that if you say that potentially, eh, someone could have a trigger all at once, it's because it is still something very heavy because it would mean that a person in order to have a trigger at that point in one go, either the Additional Indication would have to be something fantastically accurate or is the person really advanced in the hunt?)
MB: Or, my dear friend, that it is based on a discovery that no one has ever made, but that someone can make tomorrow, that also rhymes.
(Q - Xavier D’Homan: Someone or, in your opinion, several someones.)
MB: Or someone…
(Q - Xavier d’Homan: Yes, or someone yes, but I mean…)
MB: Women are smart, they are more calm. It can help them.
MB: Yes, Mr. Becker doesn't hear you very well considering his age, but he hears you.
(Q - ??: Yes, Good evening, this is the first time, I'm a new neat guy. So I listened to all the vocals that were available on Youtube. I'm starting to arrive on the Discord and so I had a question regarding this famous indication that you are going to release soon. Will this indication that you are going to release need to be deciphered or deciphered or is it rather another way of doing it? 'bring a new way of seeing things, and that as a result there will be absolutely no decryption or deciphering at all on this indication.)
MB: My little finger tells me that it should be quite poetic and that in matters of poetry every word has a meaning.
(Q - ??: Okay OK, very good perfect, thank you very much. )
MB: You will have a great time if you like reading, if you like words and if you are able to look for their meaning, you will have a great time.
(Q - Xavier D’Homan: Are we going to have something as long as the Bible?)
MB: No, it's not as long as the Bible. No, I limited myself to 25 chapters and 158 pages.
(Q - ??: Will it be interpretable by Michel de la Fontaine.)
MB: Has it ever happened that I could at one point say something that could not be interpreted?
(Q - Apollo: No, I'm talking about the poem and the words that will be used for this poem, will these words be interpretable? You know very well that we bicker over words, on pieces of sentences, and there it will be a massacre.)
MB: It will be eminently interpretable. I like the interpretations, that's the goal. I look forward to the idea of ??what you will be able to concoct after reading my few lines.
(Q - Harvester: Well, we're back for 30 years.)
MB: Well that’s not sure. And parenthetically, I am 100% honest. Please listen carefully to what I tell you, I am 100% honest when I tell you, the owl may be discovered next week or it may not be discovered again in 30 or 40 years. Both are possible [Brouhaha] Ah but it's painful, you're always putting the responsibility on my side. In fact, the discovery of the owl relies on your ability to understand, interpret, imagine, it no longer depends on me. Given everything I've thrown at you, by God, I've thrown a lot at you. Well today it's on your side, it's on your side that it's happening. Either someone really has the trigger and says, Oh God no, that's it, all of a sudden I understand and it's going to go very quickly, or for reasons which for me remain a little obscure I Admit it, no one is considering the good possibility and in 30 years, we are still there. Well, not me, but you.
(Q - Xavier D'Homan: Ah, it's still scary when you think about it, when you say yeah, maybe as soon as someone comes out with the Additional Indication, it maybe someone will say oh that's it, I found it and it's crazy all the same.)
MB: Yes, but it’s scary for me too, huh. You shouldn't think that you are the only ones who are freaking out, eh. I say to myself, I talk to them, I tell them things, I throw things at them wow, a little bit heavy, they see, they don't see, they dodge, they digest. Three days later, we no longer talk about it. A day before, we are still talking about it, 3 days later, we are no longer talking about it. For me, it's scary too, eh, how I can do it, how I can do it so that my words, so that what I'm trying to say survives, is printed, impacts the reasoning of the owls, it's no more obvious to you, to me, huh?
(Q - Xavier D'Homan: Yeah but Michel, you agree that if you say that potentially, eh, someone could have a trigger all at once, it's because it is still something very heavy because it would mean that a person in order to have a trigger at that point in one go, either the Additional Indication would have to be something fantastically accurate or is the person really advanced in the hunt?)
MB: Or, my dear friend, that it is based on a discovery that no one has ever made, but that someone can make tomorrow, that also rhymes.
(Q - Xavier D’Homan: Someone or, in your opinion, several someones.)
MB: Or someone…
(Q - Xavier d’Homan: Yes, or someone yes, but I mean…)
MB: Women are smart, they are more calm. It can help them.