(Q - RD62: on the last one, the work in the field, as you say, it can take 2 hours. It's not 2 hours looking for a landmark I imagine, it's 2 hours
to understand what we need to do.)
MB: Indeed. Exactly.
(Q - RD62: Once again, is what we have in our head playable or do we have to maximize the book and we need a telephone, finally the internet, I want say. We need some tools or just what we have in our heads, is that enough?)
MB: You know when I watch on these television channels, planets and others, the professional treasure hunters…
(Q - RD62: they have internet on site.)
MB: No, no, that's not at all what I mean. No, no, no, no, nothing to do with it. These are people who are documented, who know the subject and who, when they intervene, operate by focusing on the information they have and eliminating any, how shall I put it, fanciful or random interpretations of this or that element is people who are documented, who know exactly what they are doing. In the case of the golden owl, I think that the moment someone is confronted with the..., I repeat the super solution, although I don't like this term, at least the ultimate solution, I think that at that moment, the person who knows his subject, who has all the elements, can appreciate the relevance of this or that element. It's exactly the same thing, therefore, between what happens to people whose job it is and the gold owl seekers.
MB: Indeed. Exactly.
(Q - RD62: Once again, is what we have in our head playable or do we have to maximize the book and we need a telephone, finally the internet, I want say. We need some tools or just what we have in our heads, is that enough?)
MB: You know when I watch on these television channels, planets and others, the professional treasure hunters…
(Q - RD62: they have internet on site.)
MB: No, no, that's not at all what I mean. No, no, no, no, nothing to do with it. These are people who are documented, who know the subject and who, when they intervene, operate by focusing on the information they have and eliminating any, how shall I put it, fanciful or random interpretations of this or that element is people who are documented, who know exactly what they are doing. In the case of the golden owl, I think that the moment someone is confronted with the..., I repeat the super solution, although I don't like this term, at least the ultimate solution, I think that at that moment, the person who knows his subject, who has all the elements, can appreciate the relevance of this or that element. It's exactly the same thing, therefore, between what happens to people whose job it is and the gold owl seekers.