(Q - ??: To bounce back, that's what you were saying a few minutes ago when Max was a peddler and I understand from your message that we got smoked by the madits.
So we let them down But to find.)
MB: A camelot, it doesn't fool anyone, a camelot, it sells dreams, there you go, it dresses up the thing and it makes you dream, it makes the spectator or the listener dream. And so it's not smoke. The smoking is a bit excessive.
(Q - ??: Okay but at some point, we have to find this owl. So there's a moment, we're going to find sentinels, numbers, review. It remains bigger thing, so I'm going back more, I'm turning around more, what? Why do you say that this camelot effect remains until this stage? Can't we just move on? concentrate in terms of a great researcher? Max, it's good, we understand, it's over, but I now find myself really facing the last stage And here again we often hear in your speech that this. he was a literary man, he was a peddler, he embellished a lot of things, but hey, there is a moment, we have to work concretely and again, I saw before you arrived, in vocal, you said , but are you going to find it for me or what? Are you working on it a little bit or not, and so I'm still at a stage where I'm trying to break my teeth on it, not necessarily every time telling me it's Max Valentin, he was a peddler, et cetera, et cetera. Because this camelot effect still remains disruptive until this stage?)
MB: When you ask me these kinds of questions, I think about the answer I should give, then I say to myself, do you really, I'm talking about myself, eh, do I have a good vision of things? Am I fully aware of everything that is not necessarily proven? And if I draw a little parallel with shows that I really like to watch on channels like planet, history, thing and company, quests for treasure but for real treasures, old galleons which have sunk somewhere. When I look at how they often work, it's the Americans, that is to say what the Americans do, create companies which are companies intended to look for treasures, so they raise funds, et cetera. When I see how these people operate, that is to say that they are confronted exactly as you are somewhere, with enigmas, data which is incomplete, with things which have been peddled, distorted, reported for decades, sometimes centuries. So they make a selection of data, they take all the elements, this is what I call the cold case side. We take a file again, we reanalyze it and when I see how these people work, how they proceed in their research. They are generally, for those who find in any case, they are locked, screwed to a conviction. And they start from one, they select a certain number of basic data after having analyzed everything, cross-referenced et cetera by saying that, these are concrete, precise elements, and from there, they resume their investigation in a way. They do a search and they find, most find, there are still many treasures that are found in the end.
MB: A camelot, it doesn't fool anyone, a camelot, it sells dreams, there you go, it dresses up the thing and it makes you dream, it makes the spectator or the listener dream. And so it's not smoke. The smoking is a bit excessive.
(Q - ??: Okay but at some point, we have to find this owl. So there's a moment, we're going to find sentinels, numbers, review. It remains bigger thing, so I'm going back more, I'm turning around more, what? Why do you say that this camelot effect remains until this stage? Can't we just move on? concentrate in terms of a great researcher? Max, it's good, we understand, it's over, but I now find myself really facing the last stage And here again we often hear in your speech that this. he was a literary man, he was a peddler, he embellished a lot of things, but hey, there is a moment, we have to work concretely and again, I saw before you arrived, in vocal, you said , but are you going to find it for me or what? Are you working on it a little bit or not, and so I'm still at a stage where I'm trying to break my teeth on it, not necessarily every time telling me it's Max Valentin, he was a peddler, et cetera, et cetera. Because this camelot effect still remains disruptive until this stage?)
MB: When you ask me these kinds of questions, I think about the answer I should give, then I say to myself, do you really, I'm talking about myself, eh, do I have a good vision of things? Am I fully aware of everything that is not necessarily proven? And if I draw a little parallel with shows that I really like to watch on channels like planet, history, thing and company, quests for treasure but for real treasures, old galleons which have sunk somewhere. When I look at how they often work, it's the Americans, that is to say what the Americans do, create companies which are companies intended to look for treasures, so they raise funds, et cetera. When I see how these people operate, that is to say that they are confronted exactly as you are somewhere, with enigmas, data which is incomplete, with things which have been peddled, distorted, reported for decades, sometimes centuries. So they make a selection of data, they take all the elements, this is what I call the cold case side. We take a file again, we reanalyze it and when I see how these people work, how they proceed in their research. They are generally, for those who find in any case, they are locked, screwed to a conviction. And they start from one, they select a certain number of basic data after having analyzed everything, cross-referenced et cetera by saying that, these are concrete, precise elements, and from there, they resume their investigation in a way. They do a search and they find, most find, there are still many treasures that are found in the end.