(Q – Gringos: there are people who ask me for Michel to talk a little about the 30th birthday party, the prize to be won, etc.)
(Q - Exalastro: when you say someone who will have the trigger, they will perhaps have it in a few steps, but we are not going to call you, it will come quite quickly. I think that in the past, in the vocals we mentioned it like that How do we explain, that there are still 30 minutes to 2 hours of work on site, how can that give such confidence knowing that there is. still work once there? These 30 minutes to 2 hours, I'm not making them up eh it was clarified.)
MB: I still have a little bit of memory, I of course remember saying that, in fact, when we reason in our living room, quietly, when we are in theory, there are things which seem obvious. an irrefutable logic, when we are on the ground, irrefutable logic is confronted with things that we had not considered, that we had not seen, that we did not know of course, and we are in an environment which is less theoretical, a little more practical and we have many more "parasitic elements" to consider, which we do not see when we are in logical reasoning, we attach ourselves to what is important, to what that we have retained, we have no idea what there may be around, which could disrupt, whatever I know, the vision, the calculation, the measurement, the appreciation, whatever you want, that's it, it 'is all. So it already takes a certain amount of time and then there is this little notion that we revived some time ago of doubt, that is to say that the trigger does not quite put an end to the doubt. The trigger is what allows us to understand, we say OK, I understood and after the doubt it’s good, what do I do with it?
There you go, I think that's a pretty good summary!
(Q - Exalastro: we won't be able to understand until we have had all this click and all that but okay OK. That is to say that in fact we understood that... you mentioned it here, whether it is a distance, a direction, something which will obviously be... Well to find a treasure, you will have to apply this kind of information Well from your living room we say to ourselves it doesn't matter. distance or direction if we understood it it shouldn't take 2 hours to apply that on the ground, that's what, me for example, I found myself saying to myself from home in 5 minutes I been there in 15 not even 10 minutes I knew it was lost or not?)
MB: Well, I'll give you an example, I'll give you an image to help you understand, you look for a secret door, and then one day, you find it. You have, that's good, but it has no correlation with the puzzles, you have the key, you open this door very well. And then you come back, there are 3,4,5 undergrounds leaving and you say which one I must take, there is a doubt.
You have found, you have discovered what everyone is looking for, the secret door, but there is still a little trick to how I choose the right direction. I have 3,4,5 tunnels leaving, it's an arbitrary number, eh, I can't draw conclusions from it. But there you go, there are different possible directions, we've all seen that in science fiction films, whatever you want, whatever, we arrive somewhere, there are several directions, what is it? we do ? Voila. Well, that’s the great solution. When you open the last door, well there's still a little thing to do.
(Q – Exalastro: and so you will then eventually understand that faced with this doubt, he himself is pictured here, not knowing which path to take and with the current cost of living, we can send you to MP telling you well, I perhaps chose to take underground number 2 instead of telling myself I still have 5 left when I leave home and finally that's an example eh. said 1,2,3,4,5, it could have less or it's like they say it's basic I say to myself this is the example makes me think that what awaits me will still be more complicated to digest than I currently believe, telling myself that in front of my sentries…)
MB: that’s not that complicated. There is a little doubt but then logic takes over. I understand very well, as I am sent PM solutions, I understand it very well, but I cannot devote so much time to reading and responding to this kind of message, it is impossible. I will spend my whole days there, I assure you. So the additional principle that I would like to finalize now for verification is if it is good, there will be a click, there will be a response, there will be a small signal which will light up, if not is not good there is no answer what. It’s not good, but we will never do “You burn, you freeze” that we can’t do.
Or is it good or is it not good?
(Q - Exalastro: when you say someone who will have the trigger, they will perhaps have it in a few steps, but we are not going to call you, it will come quite quickly. I think that in the past, in the vocals we mentioned it like that How do we explain, that there are still 30 minutes to 2 hours of work on site, how can that give such confidence knowing that there is. still work once there? These 30 minutes to 2 hours, I'm not making them up eh it was clarified.)
MB: I still have a little bit of memory, I of course remember saying that, in fact, when we reason in our living room, quietly, when we are in theory, there are things which seem obvious. an irrefutable logic, when we are on the ground, irrefutable logic is confronted with things that we had not considered, that we had not seen, that we did not know of course, and we are in an environment which is less theoretical, a little more practical and we have many more "parasitic elements" to consider, which we do not see when we are in logical reasoning, we attach ourselves to what is important, to what that we have retained, we have no idea what there may be around, which could disrupt, whatever I know, the vision, the calculation, the measurement, the appreciation, whatever you want, that's it, it 'is all. So it already takes a certain amount of time and then there is this little notion that we revived some time ago of doubt, that is to say that the trigger does not quite put an end to the doubt. The trigger is what allows us to understand, we say OK, I understood and after the doubt it’s good, what do I do with it?
There you go, I think that's a pretty good summary!
(Q - Exalastro: we won't be able to understand until we have had all this click and all that but okay OK. That is to say that in fact we understood that... you mentioned it here, whether it is a distance, a direction, something which will obviously be... Well to find a treasure, you will have to apply this kind of information Well from your living room we say to ourselves it doesn't matter. distance or direction if we understood it it shouldn't take 2 hours to apply that on the ground, that's what, me for example, I found myself saying to myself from home in 5 minutes I been there in 15 not even 10 minutes I knew it was lost or not?)
MB: Well, I'll give you an example, I'll give you an image to help you understand, you look for a secret door, and then one day, you find it. You have, that's good, but it has no correlation with the puzzles, you have the key, you open this door very well. And then you come back, there are 3,4,5 undergrounds leaving and you say which one I must take, there is a doubt.
You have found, you have discovered what everyone is looking for, the secret door, but there is still a little trick to how I choose the right direction. I have 3,4,5 tunnels leaving, it's an arbitrary number, eh, I can't draw conclusions from it. But there you go, there are different possible directions, we've all seen that in science fiction films, whatever you want, whatever, we arrive somewhere, there are several directions, what is it? we do ? Voila. Well, that’s the great solution. When you open the last door, well there's still a little thing to do.
(Q – Exalastro: and so you will then eventually understand that faced with this doubt, he himself is pictured here, not knowing which path to take and with the current cost of living, we can send you to MP telling you well, I perhaps chose to take underground number 2 instead of telling myself I still have 5 left when I leave home and finally that's an example eh. said 1,2,3,4,5, it could have less or it's like they say it's basic I say to myself this is the example makes me think that what awaits me will still be more complicated to digest than I currently believe, telling myself that in front of my sentries…)
MB: that’s not that complicated. There is a little doubt but then logic takes over. I understand very well, as I am sent PM solutions, I understand it very well, but I cannot devote so much time to reading and responding to this kind of message, it is impossible. I will spend my whole days there, I assure you. So the additional principle that I would like to finalize now for verification is if it is good, there will be a click, there will be a response, there will be a small signal which will light up, if not is not good there is no answer what. It’s not good, but we will never do “You burn, you freeze” that we can’t do.
Or is it good or is it not good?