(Q - Marvinclay: there is a problem on the 580 of the barycenter, it would be necessary to trace, find in any case the central point around the 10 cities and there is precisely this point of stumbling with this
that Max said, that is to say that the map was a support rather than a tool so that disqualified this theory a little and Michel Becker you said on the contrary, well on the contrary or in any case you qualified this thing by saying that
the map could also be a tool from start to finish, it would in fact bring back this question of the barycenter, I don't know if you have an opinion on that or if you could answer it?)
MB: I have a very simple opinion: when you embark on a treasure hunt, you need a map, you need a compass, you need something to draw with, so a certain number of instruments, etc. is the basic logic, but in fact we are always confronted with the same things, this is the way Max answered all these questions and I think... it's funny because the more I listen, the more I participate and The more I advance in my thoughts on the subject, I think that in fact we are indeed dealing with a literary person who responded to people who were ultimately much more technical.
The questions he had became more and more technical, there we are talking about barycenter, a lot of things like that, and I think that compared to all the answers he was able to give, he was a little like me today, and that is to say he said to himself well they see it like that, is it good to see it like that etc, and his answers are not necessarily directly correlated to the nature of the enigma. This is what I notice in any case when reading, rereading the madits.
So on the question of cities particularly etc., obviously it's one of the enigmas where there are still a lot of questions, it has to be like that, otherwise I'm distorting the game, but I will say that in general we are once again confronted with the fact that we shouldn't get too attached to the way he responded to all that. It's unfortunate but...
(Q: Marvinclay: there is the possibility of the barycenter in quotes...)
MB: let's say that it is not demonstrated as its part by the content of the madit, if the barycenter is to be used he did not express it very well in my opinion...
(Q - Marvinclay: okay very good, that's already very useful!)
MB: well that's good but there you go, we're in a permanent limbo anyway with these questions/answers and there are times it's... for me I'm devastated, I tell myself how I'm going to do it keep up with that!
(Q - well if it's already very good, thank you Kibo thank you Mr Becker)
MB: I have a very simple opinion: when you embark on a treasure hunt, you need a map, you need a compass, you need something to draw with, so a certain number of instruments, etc. is the basic logic, but in fact we are always confronted with the same things, this is the way Max answered all these questions and I think... it's funny because the more I listen, the more I participate and The more I advance in my thoughts on the subject, I think that in fact we are indeed dealing with a literary person who responded to people who were ultimately much more technical.
The questions he had became more and more technical, there we are talking about barycenter, a lot of things like that, and I think that compared to all the answers he was able to give, he was a little like me today, and that is to say he said to himself well they see it like that, is it good to see it like that etc, and his answers are not necessarily directly correlated to the nature of the enigma. This is what I notice in any case when reading, rereading the madits.
So on the question of cities particularly etc., obviously it's one of the enigmas where there are still a lot of questions, it has to be like that, otherwise I'm distorting the game, but I will say that in general we are once again confronted with the fact that we shouldn't get too attached to the way he responded to all that. It's unfortunate but...
(Q: Marvinclay: there is the possibility of the barycenter in quotes...)
MB: let's say that it is not demonstrated as its part by the content of the madit, if the barycenter is to be used he did not express it very well in my opinion...
(Q - Marvinclay: okay very good, that's already very useful!)
MB: well that's good but there you go, we're in a permanent limbo anyway with these questions/answers and there are times it's... for me I'm devastated, I tell myself how I'm going to do it keep up with that!
(Q - well if it's already very good, thank you Kibo thank you Mr Becker)