MB: so I want to make a digression, I have said several times and I have especially written several times that the research was going in the right direction, that the players' thoughts were going in the right direction, etc.
I am obliged to consider you as a whole, as a global entity, there are more than 3000 people on the discord, there are other people who are looking and who are not on the discord.
For others, I can't know, but for what I can see and read and sometimes hear on the discord, I say indeed, the thoughts are going in the right direction, some say "Yeah but it's easy to say,
"it doesn't bring us anything", I can tell you that the way of reasoning that you have today is much better than that which was in vogue, let's say a little over a year ago, before
I won't play this game again.
The other aspect of things that seems interesting to me is that of everything I can say, well, it gives me pleasure to hear as just now that the information that I give, the elements that I give allow to move forward. That said, there is always the double reaction, there are always the pros and the antis. And then I know that I will never be unanimous, so my words always have 2 consequences, one is to anchor even more in their convictions those who consider that I do not know what I am talking about, " maybe he didn't understand well, maybe yeah, but he's not cool, he doesn't know very well, he can't really understand us", and then or so "well he doesn't "doesn't have the right solutions" it goes that far, and then there are all those who actually want to follow me and who try to rely on what I tell them and I think that the person who will win in any case, the winner will be in the camp of those who continue to advance based on the new data that I can provide on hunting. That's what I meant.
The other aspect of things that seems interesting to me is that of everything I can say, well, it gives me pleasure to hear as just now that the information that I give, the elements that I give allow to move forward. That said, there is always the double reaction, there are always the pros and the antis. And then I know that I will never be unanimous, so my words always have 2 consequences, one is to anchor even more in their convictions those who consider that I do not know what I am talking about, " maybe he didn't understand well, maybe yeah, but he's not cool, he doesn't know very well, he can't really understand us", and then or so "well he doesn't "doesn't have the right solutions" it goes that far, and then there are all those who actually want to follow me and who try to rely on what I tell them and I think that the person who will win in any case, the winner will be in the camp of those who continue to advance based on the new data that I can provide on hunting. That's what I meant.