(Q - Aladore: potentially the review is to check that everything is in order in fact.)
MB: “I’m going to corner you Michel, I’m going to corner you, you said things Michel… you have to take responsibility for Michel…”. I assume what I said, the notion we are talking about exists in all versions. We're not talking about that here. Here we are talking about a very particular thing which is the review. I find it interesting because it's a good example. Yes, I'm listening
(Q - Nabil: Were you searched when you were in the army, when you were reviewed?)
MB: They didn't need to search me, I was naked the first time!
(Q - ??: What did we review, naked?)
(Q - ??: Also, it's the exact same thing)
MB: It’s known in the army. Actually, I'm sorry but oh well. In short... For some, it would have been better if we were completely naked but anyway, let's move on, I don't want to be serious.
(Q - Nabil: but there is no one here who is able to explain the passage in the magazine to you already so is it serious?)
MB: Well Ok, I completely agree that we take an example. So Ok, here we go. This review? I mean, what is a review? The President of the Republic reviewed the National Guard, what is it?
(Q - Xavier: Well if we're talking about the president, it's still slightly different because I very much doubt that the president will review the troops to detect a problem they might have in their outfit .)
MB: so what does the president do?
(Q - Xavier: well he’s passing, it’s an honor. Well, I don’t know…)
MB: no it's not an honor, he reviews the troops, but what does he actually do? He walks...what does he do?
(Q - ??: he looks, he observes, he observes meticulously…)
MB: What is he doing? He's walking...does he look at them from head to toe?
(Q - ??: Well he examines yes. He examines all the details among the soldiers to say..)
MB: I would really like someone to send me a videotape where we see a general, a president of anyone, reviewing the troops and looking at them from head to toe. Are you sure they're looking from head to toe? that is to say, they start at the top, they go to the bottom, they do that? They do it, they don't?
(Q - Apollo: if there is a review, it is because before there was already a view.)
MB: No no, no no, we have to stop the circus. We're talking...No, I thought we were talking, going over, so it's not, we're reviewing, we've already seen, we'll see again tomorrow, we're reviewing something, we're talking about concept of reviewing, what does that mean?
(Q - Nabil: In the eyes?)
MB: Physically? Is it in the eyes or is it from head to toe?
(Q - Nabil: he looks in the eyes and potentially greets, right?)
MB: Well, then you realize that an expression like that requires some explanations, some clarifications and that it is appropriate to form certainty. Do we look from head to toe? Are we looking straight in the eye? What is it really, someone who reviews the troops? What does he actually do, really?
(Q - ??: the troops are motionless and he walks and looks at them one by one.)
MB: Yeah OK and? straight in the eye or up and down?
(Q - ??: straight in the eye.)
MB: So then? If I look someone straight in the eye, what do I see?
(Q - ??: his face? his expression? an aim?)
MB: I see his eyes, I see his face, so what? …and so I don’t see the rest.
(Q - ??: Ah okay, okay, okay, we look at the head, don't ask for the rest. I don't ask for the rest)
MB: No, no, no, no, no, I didn't say that. I am, with you, getting into the concept, going over it. We are struggling with an expression that seems simple to us and which in reality is not so simple since from the moment I tell you, what is review, I have no 2 identical answers.
So, it's not that simple. What really happens when a senior officer, when the holder of power, of authority, reviews a certain number of people, his troops, if we are talking at the military level. Well we realize from this simple exchange, we realize that this notion is not as clear as we might believe.
It's not as simple as that and so my point is to tell you that inside the riddles, there are expressions which would undoubtedly deserve your interest. You can see that it’s not that simple!
(Q - Xavier: no, because that's really really looking. We're looking for the little beast because if we take it, we accept it)
MB: Well, let's look for the little beast there my friend, this little beast there, it is still easier to find than ranting about decryption, at the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 10th, degree whatever. Here we are still in something that is within everyone's reach.
(Q - ??: yeah but I agree with you, sincerely I agree with you, but the problem is that if you go and ask anyone or well on the internet, in the review, it does not specify that the person is looking at the head, the eyes, that does not exist, that means that in the review we will find a generality, that means it is someone one who passes in front of the troops and he reviews them You understand, that means afterwards it's the interpretation that we could have of it But if we start to go down to the depths like that, we won't be able to. never reach the end of the expression Because the review is the review and there is no…)
(Q - Uncle Nono: let us deduce something from this, for example the review, you see people from the front, you don't see their backs, for example, that could be something that you will deduce from your review.
(Q - ??: how many passages are there in sight in the hunt then?)
MB: Well apparently I don’t know, there’s at least one mentioned, right?
(Q - ??: at least one mentioned, but I already had it a long time ago, eh.)
MB: Oh yes. Oh good?
Do you realize that I'm trying to point you in one direction?
(Q - Nabil: Yes, yes, it's very good, but I don't see the relationship…)
MB: But stop putting your feet on the brake, damn it! But you're annoying at the end, I try to tell you something and you slow down. But, no, just stop! I don't have time to waste. If I'm talking to you about this, it's because there are some interesting things in there,
(Q - ??: so Michel I'm summarizing the review.. I'm walking along the BSM)
MB: yes,
(Q - ??: I look them straight in the eye.)
(Q - Nabil: So Michel, I'm summarizing the review)
MB: Come on, let’s go (laughing)
(Q - Nabil: I walk, I walk, along the BSM…)
MB: Yes.
(Q - Nabil: …I look them straight in the eyes…)
MB: You walk, or you run my guy, yes.
(Q - Nabil: …I walk, I look at the BSM…)
MB: Yes, in the eyes.
(Q - Nabil: ...straight in the eye…)
MB: Yes. If they have eyes, come on, let's go, okay.
(Q - Nabil: ... and, and I see, I'm looking in a certain direction, surely perhaps, so...)
MB: Mmm Mmm.
(Q - Nabil: So, if I look in a certain direction. I should notice something.)
MB: Well, for me, I often had girlfriends who told me that they had a good profile and... and lo and behold, they had a good profile, then a less good one. Of course everything must be looked at from the best angle.
(Q - Nabil: Yeah, yeah, and yet that's what I sent you in a private message, but it's all weird.)
(Q - Apollo: it begins, the zone, the zone, the pile-up begins to become clearer there.)
(Q - Aladore: That's not the right angle, Nabil.)
MB: Absolutely not.
(Q - Nabil: I sent the right angle, Aladore.)
MB: I'm just telling you, there are enigmas in the texts, interesting expressions which must be considered with a particularly keen and attentive eye. Then you do what you want with it.
(Q - Apollo: but for us, it's one that really interests us. It's only one.)
MB: Well then find it there.
(Q - Nabil: Okay, what if…)
MB: There are not 50.
(Q - Apollo: we found it.)
(Q - ??: [Inaudible]...)
MB: Régis Hauser, oh no. No, no, Régis Hauser, no one knows Régis Hauser, we only knew him when he died, but Régis Hauser never existed. It was Max Valentin, a pseudonym. No, no, nothing to do with Régis Hauser.
MB: “I’m going to corner you Michel, I’m going to corner you, you said things Michel… you have to take responsibility for Michel…”. I assume what I said, the notion we are talking about exists in all versions. We're not talking about that here. Here we are talking about a very particular thing which is the review. I find it interesting because it's a good example. Yes, I'm listening
(Q - Nabil: Were you searched when you were in the army, when you were reviewed?)
MB: They didn't need to search me, I was naked the first time!
(Q - ??: What did we review, naked?)
(Q - ??: Also, it's the exact same thing)
MB: It’s known in the army. Actually, I'm sorry but oh well. In short... For some, it would have been better if we were completely naked but anyway, let's move on, I don't want to be serious.
(Q - Nabil: but there is no one here who is able to explain the passage in the magazine to you already so is it serious?)
MB: Well Ok, I completely agree that we take an example. So Ok, here we go. This review? I mean, what is a review? The President of the Republic reviewed the National Guard, what is it?
(Q - Xavier: Well if we're talking about the president, it's still slightly different because I very much doubt that the president will review the troops to detect a problem they might have in their outfit .)
MB: so what does the president do?
(Q - Xavier: well he’s passing, it’s an honor. Well, I don’t know…)
MB: no it's not an honor, he reviews the troops, but what does he actually do? He walks...what does he do?
(Q - ??: he looks, he observes, he observes meticulously…)
MB: What is he doing? He's walking...does he look at them from head to toe?
(Q - ??: Well he examines yes. He examines all the details among the soldiers to say..)
MB: I would really like someone to send me a videotape where we see a general, a president of anyone, reviewing the troops and looking at them from head to toe. Are you sure they're looking from head to toe? that is to say, they start at the top, they go to the bottom, they do that? They do it, they don't?
(Q - Apollo: if there is a review, it is because before there was already a view.)
MB: No no, no no, we have to stop the circus. We're talking...No, I thought we were talking, going over, so it's not, we're reviewing, we've already seen, we'll see again tomorrow, we're reviewing something, we're talking about concept of reviewing, what does that mean?
(Q - Nabil: In the eyes?)
MB: Physically? Is it in the eyes or is it from head to toe?
(Q - Nabil: he looks in the eyes and potentially greets, right?)
MB: Well, then you realize that an expression like that requires some explanations, some clarifications and that it is appropriate to form certainty. Do we look from head to toe? Are we looking straight in the eye? What is it really, someone who reviews the troops? What does he actually do, really?
(Q - ??: the troops are motionless and he walks and looks at them one by one.)
MB: Yeah OK and? straight in the eye or up and down?
(Q - ??: straight in the eye.)
MB: So then? If I look someone straight in the eye, what do I see?
(Q - ??: his face? his expression? an aim?)
MB: I see his eyes, I see his face, so what? …and so I don’t see the rest.
(Q - ??: Ah okay, okay, okay, we look at the head, don't ask for the rest. I don't ask for the rest)
MB: No, no, no, no, no, I didn't say that. I am, with you, getting into the concept, going over it. We are struggling with an expression that seems simple to us and which in reality is not so simple since from the moment I tell you, what is review, I have no 2 identical answers.
So, it's not that simple. What really happens when a senior officer, when the holder of power, of authority, reviews a certain number of people, his troops, if we are talking at the military level. Well we realize from this simple exchange, we realize that this notion is not as clear as we might believe.
It's not as simple as that and so my point is to tell you that inside the riddles, there are expressions which would undoubtedly deserve your interest. You can see that it’s not that simple!
(Q - Xavier: no, because that's really really looking. We're looking for the little beast because if we take it, we accept it)
MB: Well, let's look for the little beast there my friend, this little beast there, it is still easier to find than ranting about decryption, at the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 10th, degree whatever. Here we are still in something that is within everyone's reach.
(Q - ??: yeah but I agree with you, sincerely I agree with you, but the problem is that if you go and ask anyone or well on the internet, in the review, it does not specify that the person is looking at the head, the eyes, that does not exist, that means that in the review we will find a generality, that means it is someone one who passes in front of the troops and he reviews them You understand, that means afterwards it's the interpretation that we could have of it But if we start to go down to the depths like that, we won't be able to. never reach the end of the expression Because the review is the review and there is no…)
(Q - Uncle Nono: let us deduce something from this, for example the review, you see people from the front, you don't see their backs, for example, that could be something that you will deduce from your review.
(Q - ??: how many passages are there in sight in the hunt then?)
MB: Well apparently I don’t know, there’s at least one mentioned, right?
(Q - ??: at least one mentioned, but I already had it a long time ago, eh.)
MB: Oh yes. Oh good?
Do you realize that I'm trying to point you in one direction?
(Q - Nabil: Yes, yes, it's very good, but I don't see the relationship…)
MB: But stop putting your feet on the brake, damn it! But you're annoying at the end, I try to tell you something and you slow down. But, no, just stop! I don't have time to waste. If I'm talking to you about this, it's because there are some interesting things in there,
(Q - ??: so Michel I'm summarizing the review.. I'm walking along the BSM)
MB: yes,
(Q - ??: I look them straight in the eye.)
(Q - Nabil: So Michel, I'm summarizing the review)
MB: Come on, let’s go (laughing)
(Q - Nabil: I walk, I walk, along the BSM…)
MB: Yes.
(Q - Nabil: …I look them straight in the eyes…)
MB: You walk, or you run my guy, yes.
(Q - Nabil: …I walk, I look at the BSM…)
MB: Yes, in the eyes.
(Q - Nabil: ...straight in the eye…)
MB: Yes. If they have eyes, come on, let's go, okay.
(Q - Nabil: ... and, and I see, I'm looking in a certain direction, surely perhaps, so...)
MB: Mmm Mmm.
(Q - Nabil: So, if I look in a certain direction. I should notice something.)
MB: Well, for me, I often had girlfriends who told me that they had a good profile and... and lo and behold, they had a good profile, then a less good one. Of course everything must be looked at from the best angle.
(Q - Nabil: Yeah, yeah, and yet that's what I sent you in a private message, but it's all weird.)
(Q - Apollo: it begins, the zone, the zone, the pile-up begins to become clearer there.)
(Q - Aladore: That's not the right angle, Nabil.)
MB: Absolutely not.
(Q - Nabil: I sent the right angle, Aladore.)
MB: I'm just telling you, there are enigmas in the texts, interesting expressions which must be considered with a particularly keen and attentive eye. Then you do what you want with it.
(Q - Apollo: but for us, it's one that really interests us. It's only one.)
MB: Well then find it there.
(Q - Nabil: Okay, what if…)
MB: There are not 50.
(Q - Apollo: we found it.)
(Q - ??: [Inaudible]...)
MB: Régis Hauser, oh no. No, no, Régis Hauser, no one knows Régis Hauser, we only knew him when he died, but Régis Hauser never existed. It was Max Valentin, a pseudonym. No, no, nothing to do with Régis Hauser.