(Q - Nabil: Michel, there is yet another thing that I don't understand.)
MB: Ah, that doesn’t surprise me.
(Q - Nabil: Well yes, I'm in 650, I'm on the sentries and I'm thinking. And so, I would have to go back to try to capture this expression or is it that the trigger can be made without this expression? Because I don't really understand how it happens in the game, at that moment. Because I'm on sentries and I'm trying to... I'm thinking, focused. on the sentries, more or less and there, I have the impression that… I have to go and get something capilo what.)
MB: What is the objective? Do you want me to give it to you, the expression?
(Q - Nabil: No no, the question is... uh.. In fact, the purpose of this click, the click... It comes thanks to this expression where it was because or if we can have it without this expression, because if I am in 650, it is because I am in this enigma, and... and I am not going... there is nothing that tells me, go look for this expression or... So that means that the notion, if there is a certain logic, that would mean that if I am among the sentries and so on, it is that there is a notion that will make me tilt and perhaps that I'm going to remember this expression? It's a bit, it's a bit confusing, right? He must have notions of this expression everywhere)
MB: It’s downright confusing. Well yes, downright confused. Why make it simple when you can make it complicated ? But of course. No, no, it's much simpler. No no. There is an expression. There is an expression, you have to find it. Go to work !
(Q - Nabil: For me, simplicity makes me say that this expression would be in 650. Since I am in a conundrum, then I must understand this enigma.)
MB: Come on, let’s go, okay? So Ok, here we go, she is in 650. So what is the expression?
(Q - ??: So what I see, the only thing I see would be…)
MB: The 650 doesn't have 50 lines, does it? So of course, let's go.
(Q - ??: Review)
MB: Okay so it's Review then, the expression is review, OK afterwards?
(Q - ??: There you go, review.)
(Q - ??: In everyday language…)
MB: OK, I get it, I get it, I get it. Ok, come on, military language, here we go.
(Q- ??: Coverage of the team with Zizou passing.)
MB: It's not military, it's football.
(Q - ??: To review is to review, it is to count, that's it too…)
(Q - Apollon / Aladore / Nabil: but we review, we look, we look at the soldiers, we observe them, from top to bottom, it's checking what's wrong... in the more it the if there is the idea of ??vision, there is…)
MB: That’s funny. I did my military service, I did my military service, it still existed at the time, one year, 12 months. Okay, what is review? I just heard it's looking up and down?
(Q - Roch: Yes, from head to toe or feet to head, right?)
(Q - Xavier: check the troops at attention)
(Q - Nabil: check that all the equipment is good, right? I didn't do military service but that must be it, all the equipment, the uniforms, everything is good… )
MB: Okay, so “I didn’t do military service but that must be it…easy
(Q - ??: Because when we think about it, it's true that it's an expression that we could, how should I say, use not regularly, but easily now, but which has a source, there is a military source which is older.)
MB: Ah, perhaps we are touching on something, perhaps there are different expressions in the texts which, indeed, have an original meaning, which is not quite the popularized meaning, which we use today.
(Q - ??: We need to do a documentary search then Michel. …)
(Q - ??: Let's say that the moment, what we use now, there is no longer, the military side, that means that except obviously, if we address soldiers . But I mean, if we now use review, let's admit, we're going to take vehicles, I've reviewed them all, not one is all right, but here we're talking about vehicles and yet we use an expression which is logical, I have reviewed them all or for example you do an accounting, you say there you go, I checked the figures, I reviewed everything, it's good, there, it's logical, that means we can use it easily, it's not obsolete obviously, but it doesn't have the military side that it originally had.) <. br />
MB: well there you go, that seems to be a good example, for example eh... of an expression which can have a military meaning in this case, and then much more vulgar, common, used by everyone. This is a good example.
(Q - ??: But Cébazat)
MB: I didn't say it wasn't that, I didn't say it wasn't that. I say, that's a good example.
(Q - ??: no, because we're going to end up in a riddle, otherwise if each time Michel tells us, it's this or not that, we're not finished either)
MB: Absolutely don’t piss off, eh! But between us, it's a good example, there, we just talked for a few minutes, about an expression which ultimately can really have different meanings, can take extremely different meanings depending on whether we use it in a strictly context. military. I have never heard parenthetically that among the military, we review anything other than men. All right. And it's an interesting example because we forget it, today we tend to take it like that and we don't because the military no longer exists in everyday life, they no longer exist, there are no more of military service. The military is a job, they are people who do a job, which is not ours. Well, there you go, and we say review, as we say other things, and which are like that, which appear like that, totally innocuous, accepted by everyone and which is in reality, if we are interested to their etymology, can have a possibly different meaning.
(Q - ??: And you know, this is the exercise we just did. We've been doing it for a month, eh, we're studying the expressions, we're finding out about their old acceptance etc… We still work, eh, we shouldn't...)
(Q - ??: What if I said it's a review of details?)
MB: Yes, well. If you said it's a detailed review, yes, it's a detailed review, okay and should I react there?
(Q - ??: Yes, but what do you say?)
MB: Well, I say that it’s good to be able to pose the problem in this way. It's very good to refine, to try to clarify things.
(Q - ??: Otherwise Review means finding errors.)
MB: Didn’t you do your military service? No, but I did my military service, I was passed over. I know what that means. I know what the person reviewing his troops is doing. There we go, we're on an example and let's try to push it a little bit.
(Q - Nabil: The person who reviews people, checks what)
MB: Well, I don't know, I improvise, but you don't have to improvise, you have to be precise when hunting for the golden owl.
(Q - ??: Yes so, to have the trigger, you have to have culture.)
(Q - Mupsai: I also did my military service, so clearly the review of what the chief warrant officers do in general is in charge of that and but the clearly reviewing the chief warrant officer, his job is to see if everyone is straight. If everyone has exactly the same outfit, that there are no wrong elements, any items. correct clothing and that everyone meets the standard.
So the review, what the person doing the review is trying to identify. Maybe also then it's not just that, but it's also about checking that everyone is up to standard.)
MB: So that’s interesting, very interesting Mupsai thank you. Do not confuse, review and review details.
(Q - Mupsai: Yes it's a different concept, I'm just talking about the moment, the review, sometimes not always, but sometimes the continuation of the review is the medal presentation. )
MB: Yes, yes, absolutely, absolutely. That may be the case. Personally, that didn't happen to me. This has never happened to me, but I have still been passed in sight.
(Q - ??: Does considering the review, as opposed to a parade, where it is the troops passing in front of the personality and the review, is the personality that passes in front of the troops Can it be a plus to consider the difference or not?)
(Q- Xavier: Well, to review, it's the person who reviews, it's necessary because otherwise it's not really a review. If it's the troops who parade in front of the person, it's not a review.)
MB: Ah, that doesn’t surprise me.
(Q - Nabil: Well yes, I'm in 650, I'm on the sentries and I'm thinking. And so, I would have to go back to try to capture this expression or is it that the trigger can be made without this expression? Because I don't really understand how it happens in the game, at that moment. Because I'm on sentries and I'm trying to... I'm thinking, focused. on the sentries, more or less and there, I have the impression that… I have to go and get something capilo what.)
MB: What is the objective? Do you want me to give it to you, the expression?
(Q - Nabil: No no, the question is... uh.. In fact, the purpose of this click, the click... It comes thanks to this expression where it was because or if we can have it without this expression, because if I am in 650, it is because I am in this enigma, and... and I am not going... there is nothing that tells me, go look for this expression or... So that means that the notion, if there is a certain logic, that would mean that if I am among the sentries and so on, it is that there is a notion that will make me tilt and perhaps that I'm going to remember this expression? It's a bit, it's a bit confusing, right? He must have notions of this expression everywhere)
MB: It’s downright confusing. Well yes, downright confused. Why make it simple when you can make it complicated ? But of course. No, no, it's much simpler. No no. There is an expression. There is an expression, you have to find it. Go to work !
(Q - Nabil: For me, simplicity makes me say that this expression would be in 650. Since I am in a conundrum, then I must understand this enigma.)
MB: Come on, let’s go, okay? So Ok, here we go, she is in 650. So what is the expression?
(Q - ??: So what I see, the only thing I see would be…)
MB: The 650 doesn't have 50 lines, does it? So of course, let's go.
(Q - ??: Review)
MB: Okay so it's Review then, the expression is review, OK afterwards?
(Q - ??: There you go, review.)
(Q - ??: In everyday language…)
MB: OK, I get it, I get it, I get it. Ok, come on, military language, here we go.
(Q- ??: Coverage of the team with Zizou passing.)
MB: It's not military, it's football.
(Q - ??: To review is to review, it is to count, that's it too…)
(Q - Apollon / Aladore / Nabil: but we review, we look, we look at the soldiers, we observe them, from top to bottom, it's checking what's wrong... in the more it the if there is the idea of ??vision, there is…)
MB: That’s funny. I did my military service, I did my military service, it still existed at the time, one year, 12 months. Okay, what is review? I just heard it's looking up and down?
(Q - Roch: Yes, from head to toe or feet to head, right?)
(Q - Xavier: check the troops at attention)
(Q - Nabil: check that all the equipment is good, right? I didn't do military service but that must be it, all the equipment, the uniforms, everything is good… )
MB: Okay, so “I didn’t do military service but that must be it…easy
(Q - ??: Because when we think about it, it's true that it's an expression that we could, how should I say, use not regularly, but easily now, but which has a source, there is a military source which is older.)
MB: Ah, perhaps we are touching on something, perhaps there are different expressions in the texts which, indeed, have an original meaning, which is not quite the popularized meaning, which we use today.
(Q - ??: We need to do a documentary search then Michel. …)
(Q - ??: Let's say that the moment, what we use now, there is no longer, the military side, that means that except obviously, if we address soldiers . But I mean, if we now use review, let's admit, we're going to take vehicles, I've reviewed them all, not one is all right, but here we're talking about vehicles and yet we use an expression which is logical, I have reviewed them all or for example you do an accounting, you say there you go, I checked the figures, I reviewed everything, it's good, there, it's logical, that means we can use it easily, it's not obsolete obviously, but it doesn't have the military side that it originally had.) <. br />
MB: well there you go, that seems to be a good example, for example eh... of an expression which can have a military meaning in this case, and then much more vulgar, common, used by everyone. This is a good example.
(Q - ??: But Cébazat)
MB: I didn't say it wasn't that, I didn't say it wasn't that. I say, that's a good example.
(Q - ??: no, because we're going to end up in a riddle, otherwise if each time Michel tells us, it's this or not that, we're not finished either)
MB: Absolutely don’t piss off, eh! But between us, it's a good example, there, we just talked for a few minutes, about an expression which ultimately can really have different meanings, can take extremely different meanings depending on whether we use it in a strictly context. military. I have never heard parenthetically that among the military, we review anything other than men. All right. And it's an interesting example because we forget it, today we tend to take it like that and we don't because the military no longer exists in everyday life, they no longer exist, there are no more of military service. The military is a job, they are people who do a job, which is not ours. Well, there you go, and we say review, as we say other things, and which are like that, which appear like that, totally innocuous, accepted by everyone and which is in reality, if we are interested to their etymology, can have a possibly different meaning.
(Q - ??: And you know, this is the exercise we just did. We've been doing it for a month, eh, we're studying the expressions, we're finding out about their old acceptance etc… We still work, eh, we shouldn't...)
(Q - ??: What if I said it's a review of details?)
MB: Yes, well. If you said it's a detailed review, yes, it's a detailed review, okay and should I react there?
(Q - ??: Yes, but what do you say?)
MB: Well, I say that it’s good to be able to pose the problem in this way. It's very good to refine, to try to clarify things.
(Q - ??: Otherwise Review means finding errors.)
MB: Didn’t you do your military service? No, but I did my military service, I was passed over. I know what that means. I know what the person reviewing his troops is doing. There we go, we're on an example and let's try to push it a little bit.
(Q - Nabil: The person who reviews people, checks what)
MB: Well, I don't know, I improvise, but you don't have to improvise, you have to be precise when hunting for the golden owl.
(Q - ??: Yes so, to have the trigger, you have to have culture.)
(Q - Mupsai: I also did my military service, so clearly the review of what the chief warrant officers do in general is in charge of that and but the clearly reviewing the chief warrant officer, his job is to see if everyone is straight. If everyone has exactly the same outfit, that there are no wrong elements, any items. correct clothing and that everyone meets the standard.
So the review, what the person doing the review is trying to identify. Maybe also then it's not just that, but it's also about checking that everyone is up to standard.)
MB: So that’s interesting, very interesting Mupsai thank you. Do not confuse, review and review details.
(Q - Mupsai: Yes it's a different concept, I'm just talking about the moment, the review, sometimes not always, but sometimes the continuation of the review is the medal presentation. )
MB: Yes, yes, absolutely, absolutely. That may be the case. Personally, that didn't happen to me. This has never happened to me, but I have still been passed in sight.
(Q - ??: Does considering the review, as opposed to a parade, where it is the troops passing in front of the personality and the review, is the personality that passes in front of the troops Can it be a plus to consider the difference or not?)
(Q- Xavier: Well, to review, it's the person who reviews, it's necessary because otherwise it's not really a review. If it's the troops who parade in front of the person, it's not a review.)