MB: we are going in the right direction, I am sure of it.
(Q - ??: What do you want to bet with us, Michel, for this week, for next week?)
MB: Well listen, I'll leave the choice of weapons to you.
(Q - Nabil: We'll see you next Sunday Michel.)
(Q - Xavier: So, if before a week, …)
MB: But what are we betting? What do we bet?
(Q - Xavier: Well if before a week, there is someone who finds the owl, you provide information on how to find the owl. OK?)
(Q - Nabil: No no, if someone hasn't found it, we'll see you next Sunday. Ok Michel? Come on… hahaha)
(Q - Xavier: No but, Michel, it's really incredible because you're going to say, I may have the impression of repeating myself at the moment, but we are in the process of to say there, well personally I am saying to myself that after 30 years of hunting, that means that we have the impression that now everything is concentrated on the same thing, that is to say an expression, and there you are telling us more, helping us by saying well it's in the text, we can use... so you were much more precise in the titles, in the... and here you are telling us that the person, a person could potentially find, by finding an expression, that is to say that if by telling people it's there, it's there, you said it 2 people ago. who said it, You're not afraid that it will end in... in blood sausage? It's just a question, eh, it's just to know. After so much research, we really have the impression. that we are now focusing on a single thing that will make someone who has, one, 2, 3, 10 people who will have a little sharper mind, will find the right expression, and in 10 days it's over.)
(Q - Nabil: but you know what Xavier? If necessary you give me the expression and if necessary I couldn't, I would be incapable of deploying the super-solution for example.)
(Q - Apollo: Michel Michel I have a question! You just said that most researchers are 1000 miles from the right solution? That's right, that's what I Did you listen? Most researchers are 1000 miles from the right solution, is that what you said earlier?)
(Q - ??: Mentally, he said mentally)
MB: It’s impressive, eh… It’s very impressive… frankly, eh!
(Q - ??: …give us the expression then, while we’re at it…)
(Q - Apollo: Let Michel answer, let Michel answer!)
MB: It’s impressive because you work, you go quickly, eh! You react very quickly, you deduce very quickly, you conclude very quickly. It's impressive ! It's impressive. You're going fast, but you're going too fast! You should still stay calm. From what I have just told you, I take nothing away. I actually said exactly what I just said.
(Q - Apollo: You said: most researchers are 1000 leagues from the right solution, right?
(Q - Roc: Mentally.)
MB: Mentally, it’s a determining, important notion. Mentally because it is very, very easy to deviate from your trajectory, from the moment you are influenced. So, as most of you are susceptible to influence, you are listening there, I know that well. You listen, you interact with people who are sure of themselves, who tell you things, and who manage to sow doubt in your mind. And which lead you to question, to doubt your own convictions. That's really what's special about the owl story. It's that we have 30 years of arrears, we have 30 years of convictions, we have lots of people who say things, for the most part who are completely delusional - or well I say most, I should say the whole thing, almost - and you are, today when we are talking live, you can't convince yourself of what I'm telling you.
You are in a perpetual attitude of doubt, and for those who are on the verge of the solution, who are not far away, the doubt is so strong that... poof! there is nothing left in front. We are in total doubt. In fact, we are in total doubt. We don't even realize that we may be very close to the solution.
(Q - ??: I have an idea for the bet. I suggest that if an owler finds the owl by next Monday midnight 53, you offer him an extra table, a table of riddles?)
MB: With pleasure. It won't be a painting of enigmas because they no longer belong to me, but I would be happy to offer him a painting.
(Q - ??: With everything you have just said today and for a month now, are you still saying, are you still maintaining that it is impossible to 'have 2 triggers in 2 different people at the same time?)
MB: It's very, very unlikely. You know, the great inventions were made, sometimes simultaneously, but rarely, there is always a little gap, whether we are talking about the telephone, we are talking about electricity, we are talking about whatever we want, the great inventions, they actually came from a collective mechanism. They occurred, not simultaneously but almost simultaneously or at least within a short period of time, in different places around the world. This means that there are ideas circulating and there is a collective functioning that is real, that exists. Whether it is the imagination, whether it is at the level of ideas, options, great inventions, etc., all of this has developed in a strangely simultaneous or almost simultaneous way in different places in the world.
So to say that today there would be several researchers, several owls who would simultaneously find the solution? Ugh. At the same time, I really doubt it; in a reduced, restricted period of time, possibly, but with the information I have provided today, I do not believe so. I would have to go further, I would have to give more clues so that the scenario could be considered.
(Q - ??: Michel? A quick question, finally, would you say that the moment we notice this expression, one of the first things we could say to ourselves as an owl, it’s “oh no, he didn’t do that, the nerve”, and precisely, facing this doubt as you say?)
MB: Tell me more about your question, I'm not sure I understood correctly?
(Q - ??: What do you want to bet with us, Michel, for this week, for next week?)
MB: Well listen, I'll leave the choice of weapons to you.
(Q - Nabil: We'll see you next Sunday Michel.)
(Q - Xavier: So, if before a week, …)
MB: But what are we betting? What do we bet?
(Q - Xavier: Well if before a week, there is someone who finds the owl, you provide information on how to find the owl. OK?)
(Q - Nabil: No no, if someone hasn't found it, we'll see you next Sunday. Ok Michel? Come on… hahaha)
(Q - Xavier: No but, Michel, it's really incredible because you're going to say, I may have the impression of repeating myself at the moment, but we are in the process of to say there, well personally I am saying to myself that after 30 years of hunting, that means that we have the impression that now everything is concentrated on the same thing, that is to say an expression, and there you are telling us more, helping us by saying well it's in the text, we can use... so you were much more precise in the titles, in the... and here you are telling us that the person, a person could potentially find, by finding an expression, that is to say that if by telling people it's there, it's there, you said it 2 people ago. who said it, You're not afraid that it will end in... in blood sausage? It's just a question, eh, it's just to know. After so much research, we really have the impression. that we are now focusing on a single thing that will make someone who has, one, 2, 3, 10 people who will have a little sharper mind, will find the right expression, and in 10 days it's over.)
(Q - Nabil: but you know what Xavier? If necessary you give me the expression and if necessary I couldn't, I would be incapable of deploying the super-solution for example.)
(Q - Apollo: Michel Michel I have a question! You just said that most researchers are 1000 miles from the right solution? That's right, that's what I Did you listen? Most researchers are 1000 miles from the right solution, is that what you said earlier?)
(Q - ??: Mentally, he said mentally)
MB: It’s impressive, eh… It’s very impressive… frankly, eh!
(Q - ??: …give us the expression then, while we’re at it…)
(Q - Apollo: Let Michel answer, let Michel answer!)
MB: It’s impressive because you work, you go quickly, eh! You react very quickly, you deduce very quickly, you conclude very quickly. It's impressive ! It's impressive. You're going fast, but you're going too fast! You should still stay calm. From what I have just told you, I take nothing away. I actually said exactly what I just said.
(Q - Apollo: You said: most researchers are 1000 leagues from the right solution, right?
(Q - Roc: Mentally.)
MB: Mentally, it’s a determining, important notion. Mentally because it is very, very easy to deviate from your trajectory, from the moment you are influenced. So, as most of you are susceptible to influence, you are listening there, I know that well. You listen, you interact with people who are sure of themselves, who tell you things, and who manage to sow doubt in your mind. And which lead you to question, to doubt your own convictions. That's really what's special about the owl story. It's that we have 30 years of arrears, we have 30 years of convictions, we have lots of people who say things, for the most part who are completely delusional - or well I say most, I should say the whole thing, almost - and you are, today when we are talking live, you can't convince yourself of what I'm telling you.
You are in a perpetual attitude of doubt, and for those who are on the verge of the solution, who are not far away, the doubt is so strong that... poof! there is nothing left in front. We are in total doubt. In fact, we are in total doubt. We don't even realize that we may be very close to the solution.
(Q - ??: I have an idea for the bet. I suggest that if an owler finds the owl by next Monday midnight 53, you offer him an extra table, a table of riddles?)
MB: With pleasure. It won't be a painting of enigmas because they no longer belong to me, but I would be happy to offer him a painting.
(Q - ??: With everything you have just said today and for a month now, are you still saying, are you still maintaining that it is impossible to 'have 2 triggers in 2 different people at the same time?)
MB: It's very, very unlikely. You know, the great inventions were made, sometimes simultaneously, but rarely, there is always a little gap, whether we are talking about the telephone, we are talking about electricity, we are talking about whatever we want, the great inventions, they actually came from a collective mechanism. They occurred, not simultaneously but almost simultaneously or at least within a short period of time, in different places around the world. This means that there are ideas circulating and there is a collective functioning that is real, that exists. Whether it is the imagination, whether it is at the level of ideas, options, great inventions, etc., all of this has developed in a strangely simultaneous or almost simultaneous way in different places in the world.
So to say that today there would be several researchers, several owls who would simultaneously find the solution? Ugh. At the same time, I really doubt it; in a reduced, restricted period of time, possibly, but with the information I have provided today, I do not believe so. I would have to go further, I would have to give more clues so that the scenario could be considered.
(Q - ??: Michel? A quick question, finally, would you say that the moment we notice this expression, one of the first things we could say to ourselves as an owl, it’s “oh no, he didn’t do that, the nerve”, and precisely, facing this doubt as you say?)
MB: Tell me more about your question, I'm not sure I understood correctly?