(Q – nlc: yes but to make the synthesis, if we don't care about the starting point what do we retain from the enigma to make the synthesis)
MB : Wait, it’s not just the starting point, there’s a lot going on anyway. There are a lot of elements all the same, which are “guidance” elements which are made to take you somewhere and other elements which will be useful to us at the time of the SE. If the question is whether the starting point closes at the time of the SE, at the time of the SE we no longer give a damn about the starting point.
(Q – bioposis: my question was “the way” in which we find the starting point since we have to make a synthesis of what we have learned, so I learned how I find my starting point, is it important how I learn it)
MB : ha no, for the SE, no (!!!!!!). SE is CDB it is not the same reasoning, so the reasoning that the aura used for the starting point is absolutely not useful for the SE, not at all. It gives clarity on the CBD, we reason differently, it’s the last step, the ultimate moment and it’s no longer the same system.
MB : Wait, it’s not just the starting point, there’s a lot going on anyway. There are a lot of elements all the same, which are “guidance” elements which are made to take you somewhere and other elements which will be useful to us at the time of the SE. If the question is whether the starting point closes at the time of the SE, at the time of the SE we no longer give a damn about the starting point.
(Q – bioposis: my question was “the way” in which we find the starting point since we have to make a synthesis of what we have learned, so I learned how I find my starting point, is it important how I learn it)
MB : ha no, for the SE, no (!!!!!!). SE is CDB it is not the same reasoning, so the reasoning that the aura used for the starting point is absolutely not useful for the SE, not at all. It gives clarity on the CBD, we reason differently, it’s the last step, the ultimate moment and it’s no longer the same system.