(Q - ??: So, Michel, you don't think that... you wanted to provide additional information for the 30th anniversary of hunting, you don't think that it could be that in fact, we
balance 2, 3 madits and you confirm them, yes or no? Because 2,3 madits are very interesting, but could you confirm or deny them if we do, by.
example, a kind of group where we choose 10 madits from around thirty, you answer yes or no, it's true, it's false Because for me, there are a few who annoy me a little.)
MB: The tricks are… which ones?
(Q - ??: Well several in fact, I couldn't tell you..)
MB: Well, go ahead and unpack.
(Q - ??: Well for example the fact that in fact, he clearly said that the sentries were not available in all regions of France, he clearly told Max Valentin that the sentries were visible in regions of France, but not in all, which drastically reduces the field of possibilities. This is why in fact..)
.
MB: He said… No, but wait, wait. Now I too need to have a little time to understand. Max Valentin wrote, said…
(Q - ??: that the sentinels, what they were, what they represent..)
MB: Wait… There are several of you talking. I don't understand anything, I don't understand anything.
(Q - ??: As a result, Max Valentin said that the sentinels were visible in certain regions of France, but not in all. Implying that they did not exist in all regions of France.)
MB: No, but guys, wait, are you kidding me or what?
(Q - ??: No.)
MB: But stop, but anyway, but, but be nice to me. I'm an honest guy. The sentries, there are sentries, they are in one place.
there are not 2 possibilities.. There is only one possibility on the sentinels so, what does that mean? They are not... Obviously, they are not in all regions of France since they are only in one place.
(Q - ??: He was talking about nature, I think, nature..)
[Several people speak at the same time]
MB: Come on, come on, come on, you clean, you forget that, it's bullshit, it doesn't mean anything. Don't talk to me about that, no, sincerely, sincerely, don't talk to me about that. The sentinels exist, they are in one place, they exist in one place in France, that's all. So.
(Q- Palestrina: No but Michel, the question is poorly posed, we are talking about similar entities, similar entities in other regions of France. If you want, I will give you exactly the same as that , it's very clear that there were similar entities, therefore entities similar to the sentinels, in other regions of France, but not in all. has often said it. A basic example is lighthouses, obviously, there are no lighthouses in Bourges. In fact, he answers about nature. a lighthouse, if it's a mill or I don't know, it doesn't matter and he says “Yeah but we don't find entities like sentinels in all regions of France” exactly that's the basis of the question in fact. .)
MB: It makes me sick.
[Several people speak at the same time]
(Q- Palestrina: There are some who make summaries, for example Ayrin who made a very good synthesis on this where he listed a little bit of the things found in all the regions and d other things that we didn't find in all regions and so he had reduced the possibilities a little bit. But it's just to give you the context, Michel, and that's just what we're saying. is true or it's false but for example it's the type of madits, it's true that it would be interesting to tell us well that's shit.
(Q - ???: Michel, you want the exact definition of... the exact definition was “the sentinels are all in France, but there are others in our country as well as 'abroad and other sentinels in France, but not in all regions We meet them for the first time in 650 and nothing is buried at their feet. I am of course talking about the owl, not about. something else I don’t know. They’re not cities.” That’s the answer.)
MB: The exact definition of all that is smoking. It's how you get caught up in such notions that you're completely off topic. That's the kind of thing, you have no chance of finding anything or progressing of any kind by attaching yourself to such notions. This is part of everything that I define as being the toxic, extremely toxic component of madits.
Forget this kind of thing, but what can it bring you when we tell you: these entities somewhere else... But who cares... But that has nothing to do with...
(Q - ??: There is actually a kind of rarity in the end.)
(Q - ??: But no, but no…But forget the curses guys.)
MB: I tell you to…
[Several people speak at the same time]
(Q - ??: The basic question is just to know if it was not possible instead of having an Additional Indication to destroy 2.3 madits…
(Q - ?? Michel, Michel has been telling you for several vocals, you say drop the madits, there's no point in continuing?)
MB: Everything you put out, in fact... Everything, everything you try to express to me, I... I respect it, eh? Don't think that I'm taking you for imbeciles or that I'm telling you, ah you don't understand anything, thing... that's not that at all, I'm telling you, I'm telling you again, you're struggling, you have been grappling and you are still grappling with a communicator who has fooled you, who has thrown at you things such as nothing more in all that, in what you have just expressed to me there, in the very debate of the At the moment, there is nothing that can help us solve the puzzles, we are in complete smoke. We're telling you it's the conjurer who's making you laugh, you're looking at his eyes while he's working with his hands. And you didn't see the thing, you didn't see the thing because you didn't look in the right place, that's exactly it.
It’s smoke and it’s… it’s making you look elsewhere, where there’s nothing to see.
(Q - Apollo: That didn't stop the researchers from finding these... Well, many researchers from finding these sentinels, without using the madits, without smoking.)< /u>
MB: Which sentries are we talking about?
(Q - Apollo: Well the commonly accepted sentinels, I would say.)
MB: Are you sure?
(Q - Nabil: ...from Fontainebleau?)
MB: Look, I can't tell you any better. Well, I'm not here to confuse you frankly, frankly... You find the owl tomorrow I'm happy, you find it in a year, I'm happy, you find it in 10 years, if I'm still here, I'm happy And so on. Personally I no longer have any personal involvement in this. My only involvement is to help you look on the bright side. So.
MB: The tricks are… which ones?
(Q - ??: Well several in fact, I couldn't tell you..)
MB: Well, go ahead and unpack.
(Q - ??: Well for example the fact that in fact, he clearly said that the sentries were not available in all regions of France, he clearly told Max Valentin that the sentries were visible in regions of France, but not in all, which drastically reduces the field of possibilities. This is why in fact..)
.
MB: He said… No, but wait, wait. Now I too need to have a little time to understand. Max Valentin wrote, said…
(Q - ??: that the sentinels, what they were, what they represent..)
MB: Wait… There are several of you talking. I don't understand anything, I don't understand anything.
(Q - ??: As a result, Max Valentin said that the sentinels were visible in certain regions of France, but not in all. Implying that they did not exist in all regions of France.)
MB: No, but guys, wait, are you kidding me or what?
(Q - ??: No.)
MB: But stop, but anyway, but, but be nice to me. I'm an honest guy. The sentries, there are sentries, they are in one place.
there are not 2 possibilities.. There is only one possibility on the sentinels so, what does that mean? They are not... Obviously, they are not in all regions of France since they are only in one place.
(Q - ??: He was talking about nature, I think, nature..)
[Several people speak at the same time]
MB: Come on, come on, come on, you clean, you forget that, it's bullshit, it doesn't mean anything. Don't talk to me about that, no, sincerely, sincerely, don't talk to me about that. The sentinels exist, they are in one place, they exist in one place in France, that's all. So.
(Q- Palestrina: No but Michel, the question is poorly posed, we are talking about similar entities, similar entities in other regions of France. If you want, I will give you exactly the same as that , it's very clear that there were similar entities, therefore entities similar to the sentinels, in other regions of France, but not in all. has often said it. A basic example is lighthouses, obviously, there are no lighthouses in Bourges. In fact, he answers about nature. a lighthouse, if it's a mill or I don't know, it doesn't matter and he says “Yeah but we don't find entities like sentinels in all regions of France” exactly that's the basis of the question in fact. .)
MB: It makes me sick.
[Several people speak at the same time]
(Q- Palestrina: There are some who make summaries, for example Ayrin who made a very good synthesis on this where he listed a little bit of the things found in all the regions and d other things that we didn't find in all regions and so he had reduced the possibilities a little bit. But it's just to give you the context, Michel, and that's just what we're saying. is true or it's false but for example it's the type of madits, it's true that it would be interesting to tell us well that's shit.
(Q - ???: Michel, you want the exact definition of... the exact definition was “the sentinels are all in France, but there are others in our country as well as 'abroad and other sentinels in France, but not in all regions We meet them for the first time in 650 and nothing is buried at their feet. I am of course talking about the owl, not about. something else I don’t know. They’re not cities.” That’s the answer.)
MB: The exact definition of all that is smoking. It's how you get caught up in such notions that you're completely off topic. That's the kind of thing, you have no chance of finding anything or progressing of any kind by attaching yourself to such notions. This is part of everything that I define as being the toxic, extremely toxic component of madits.
Forget this kind of thing, but what can it bring you when we tell you: these entities somewhere else... But who cares... But that has nothing to do with...
(Q - ??: There is actually a kind of rarity in the end.)
(Q - ??: But no, but no…But forget the curses guys.)
MB: I tell you to…
[Several people speak at the same time]
(Q - ??: The basic question is just to know if it was not possible instead of having an Additional Indication to destroy 2.3 madits…
(Q - ?? Michel, Michel has been telling you for several vocals, you say drop the madits, there's no point in continuing?)
MB: Everything you put out, in fact... Everything, everything you try to express to me, I... I respect it, eh? Don't think that I'm taking you for imbeciles or that I'm telling you, ah you don't understand anything, thing... that's not that at all, I'm telling you, I'm telling you again, you're struggling, you have been grappling and you are still grappling with a communicator who has fooled you, who has thrown at you things such as nothing more in all that, in what you have just expressed to me there, in the very debate of the At the moment, there is nothing that can help us solve the puzzles, we are in complete smoke. We're telling you it's the conjurer who's making you laugh, you're looking at his eyes while he's working with his hands. And you didn't see the thing, you didn't see the thing because you didn't look in the right place, that's exactly it.
It’s smoke and it’s… it’s making you look elsewhere, where there’s nothing to see.
(Q - Apollo: That didn't stop the researchers from finding these... Well, many researchers from finding these sentinels, without using the madits, without smoking.)< /u>
MB: Which sentries are we talking about?
(Q - Apollo: Well the commonly accepted sentinels, I would say.)
MB: Are you sure?
(Q - Nabil: ...from Fontainebleau?)
MB: Look, I can't tell you any better. Well, I'm not here to confuse you frankly, frankly... You find the owl tomorrow I'm happy, you find it in a year, I'm happy, you find it in 10 years, if I'm still here, I'm happy And so on. Personally I no longer have any personal involvement in this. My only involvement is to help you look on the bright side. So.