(Q – bioposis: in fact my question was, out of the 11, we are in the 2nd, this charade honestly everyone is asking the question are we going to 780 with Bourges and
then it's over or are we coming back to it, would it be from your point of view to devalue the game to say that we're not coming back to it?)
(Q – nlc / syn: he can't say it, if it's an element of SE and we have to make a synthesis, take elements, go back..)
MB : Ha no, that's not a synthesis at all, that doesn't mean that we go back, we use what we understood, yes there you go, what we understood, learned, discovered , but that has nothing to do with it, when we talk about synthesis, going back, you are talking to me about the remainder, of this famous rotten concept which has lost thousands of researchers.
(Q – Gringos: that means I learned to do a charade, Morse code, etc.)
MB : But not at all, that's not a summary, summarize what we said this evening, it's a brief summary, something concentrated, that doesn't mean that I'm repeating elements, thing, not at all, that means I'm making a synthesis, what do I get out of it, I take that out. I'm not going to go looking if I left a basket behind me, that's not the approach at all.
(Q – nlc: normally the puzzles are there to take us to an area, in fact the summary is how we got to the area?)
(Q – bioposis: no, the synthesis is the pile-up!)
(Q – nlc: yes but if to find the pile-pile you have to synthesize the enigmas, that’s what Michel says, the enigmas helped us find the area)
MB : consider that the riddles each bring you knowledge, an answer, just as you want an element of knowledge, once you know it, you know it. Once you have learned your multiplication tables, you know how to count, you don't have to start from zero each time. That's exactly it when you know, when you have learned your multiplication tables, you are not obliged to start from 1 times 2 = 2, 2 times 2 =4, if it is 8 times 2 you give the results straight away. Afterwards, you don't start from scratch. A synthesis means that what you learned during the course, you use it at the level of the Super Solution, you use it in a concentrated way, that is to say that if I understood this, I I understood there, I put it into practice. It’s not that I’m going to go look for words that I left out, something that I didn’t use, but that’s the worst bullshit.
(Q – nlc: you said at the end there are words, expressions that were going to jump out at us)
MB : That’s the synthesis, it’s that at the moment you’re there where you remember everything, that famous “good god and that’s of course”. And today the doubt I have is that this trigger can occur, is it conceivable that someone will find this trigger or not.
(Q – nlc: I think yes provided you have all the good solutions to the previous puzzles, we cannot make a correct synthesis if we do not have all the good solutions)
MB : What you say is very wise, but there are 2 ways for me to approach it, it is either to provide more precise answers, to provoke a state of certainty about solutions, or to titillate enough of your imagination, in addition to everything that has already been said, to validate or invalidate its solutions.
(Q – nlc: you spoke of overlaps, we have holes but we manage to cross-reference what we are missing or to understand the solutions which are incomplete or false with all the things, moreover of the syntheses)
MB : Yeah
(Q – bioposis: if we find Bourges or Agen, it is at the moment when we make the synthesis, whether it is Bourges or Agen, we will remember how we found it ?)
MB : Yes, yes everything will seem very bright to you, absolutely.
(Q – nlc: bioposis, what bothers me is that the 1st step of the game is to find an area, so the puzzles, one way or another must lead us there, so if you don't have the right solutions, the right places, Agen or Bourges, your synthesis you don't have the right area)
(Q - bioposis: What I understood from what Michel said is that the outcome of the 11 enigmas is the pile-up)
(Q – nlc / syn: he can't say it, if it's an element of SE and we have to make a synthesis, take elements, go back..)
MB : Ha no, that's not a synthesis at all, that doesn't mean that we go back, we use what we understood, yes there you go, what we understood, learned, discovered , but that has nothing to do with it, when we talk about synthesis, going back, you are talking to me about the remainder, of this famous rotten concept which has lost thousands of researchers.
(Q – Gringos: that means I learned to do a charade, Morse code, etc.)
MB : But not at all, that's not a summary, summarize what we said this evening, it's a brief summary, something concentrated, that doesn't mean that I'm repeating elements, thing, not at all, that means I'm making a synthesis, what do I get out of it, I take that out. I'm not going to go looking if I left a basket behind me, that's not the approach at all.
(Q – nlc: normally the puzzles are there to take us to an area, in fact the summary is how we got to the area?)
(Q – bioposis: no, the synthesis is the pile-up!)
(Q – nlc: yes but if to find the pile-pile you have to synthesize the enigmas, that’s what Michel says, the enigmas helped us find the area)
MB : consider that the riddles each bring you knowledge, an answer, just as you want an element of knowledge, once you know it, you know it. Once you have learned your multiplication tables, you know how to count, you don't have to start from zero each time. That's exactly it when you know, when you have learned your multiplication tables, you are not obliged to start from 1 times 2 = 2, 2 times 2 =4, if it is 8 times 2 you give the results straight away. Afterwards, you don't start from scratch. A synthesis means that what you learned during the course, you use it at the level of the Super Solution, you use it in a concentrated way, that is to say that if I understood this, I I understood there, I put it into practice. It’s not that I’m going to go look for words that I left out, something that I didn’t use, but that’s the worst bullshit.
(Q – nlc: you said at the end there are words, expressions that were going to jump out at us)
MB : That’s the synthesis, it’s that at the moment you’re there where you remember everything, that famous “good god and that’s of course”. And today the doubt I have is that this trigger can occur, is it conceivable that someone will find this trigger or not.
(Q – nlc: I think yes provided you have all the good solutions to the previous puzzles, we cannot make a correct synthesis if we do not have all the good solutions)
MB : What you say is very wise, but there are 2 ways for me to approach it, it is either to provide more precise answers, to provoke a state of certainty about solutions, or to titillate enough of your imagination, in addition to everything that has already been said, to validate or invalidate its solutions.
(Q – nlc: you spoke of overlaps, we have holes but we manage to cross-reference what we are missing or to understand the solutions which are incomplete or false with all the things, moreover of the syntheses)
MB : Yeah
(Q – bioposis: if we find Bourges or Agen, it is at the moment when we make the synthesis, whether it is Bourges or Agen, we will remember how we found it ?)
MB : Yes, yes everything will seem very bright to you, absolutely.
(Q – nlc: bioposis, what bothers me is that the 1st step of the game is to find an area, so the puzzles, one way or another must lead us there, so if you don't have the right solutions, the right places, Agen or Bourges, your synthesis you don't have the right area)
(Q - bioposis: What I understood from what Michel said is that the outcome of the 11 enigmas is the pile-up)