Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

08/01/2023 - Enregistrement n° 50 - part 3 - 02:30:30: Light - No light should be extinguished in the hunt

(Q - Blackbeard: do you believe that in this incredible hunt, we need to turn off the light to continue moving forward?)

MB: well, here we are in an eminently abstruse statement, which implies that I could understand to the 2nd degree, that turning off the light means something and I understand nothing. We ask the question again in a much more basic way, 2nd chance.

(Q - Barbe Boire: come on, nag! Do you think that if we turn off the lights in the game, it can allow us to move forward more fluidly?)
(Q - BluePanther: I'll do the translation if you want, Michel, is Etain the light?)
(Q - Roc: Yes, it's the same question.)
(Q - Blackbeard. No, that's not the question…)

MB: what is obvious to me is that between the first statement which was in tone, a bit of a joke, the 2nd becomes much more delicate, we feel that the words are thoughtful. I feel that behind there is an implication depending on my answer, automatically, you will deduce something, right?)

(Q - Blackbeard: oh yes, that's certainly it...)

MB: There is, unfortunately for you, or fortunately, I don't know about it after all...no light is to be put out in the hunt. That was a bit of the question, eh, did I understand correctly?

(Q - Blackbeard: exactly, you understood perfectly…)

MB: this notion of switching off does not exist.

(Q - Roch: yes but be careful Michel, there was an implication in the question about the town of Étain. That was the implication.)

MB: Roch, I don't give a damn Roch, I don't give a damn about your innuendoes, I don't care, I'm not here to exploit and manage or spare your innuendoes. I am here to answer you honestly, I do.

[Discussion of 5th edition replacement issues]