(Q - Nabil: So that requires a documentary search Michel? And yet, it seemed to me that with the Super Solution we didn't need to do a documentary search. Because to search for the
origin of an expression, it requires a bit of research and for a 15 year old child...)
MB: Nabil, you will listen to yourself again in the vocal recording, and you will see that you are completely affirmative at the start of your intervention, you affirm, you begin with an affirmation, so you are translating to me your personal conviction.
(Q - Nabil: No, in fact, I have it because yes, there you go, I said that because I have the feeling that I can find the origin.)
MB: Yes, but you say that because you are not objective.
(Q - Nabil: No but if I do, I know of course, but it's an idea that I have, I tell myself that...)< br />
MB: I have been telling you for months, I have been killing myself telling you for months, start again, reconsider all that from an objective angle, stop operating with your convictions, they are not good.
(Q - Nabil: No no, but in fact from what I understood, it was just to say…)
MB: You didn't find Nabil, so your beliefs are not good.
(Q - Nabil: Yes of course)
MB: Take it again in an objective way, do not assert, but there you have…
(Q - Nabil: In fact, I say that because if we have to find the origin of the expression…)
MB: 5 minutes ago, you didn't tell me “if” you said, it's revealing, I mean that in your head you have convictions that prevent you from finding a certain form of objectivity. It's not anything else. I don't care, personally, you can speak as you want, you can express yourself as you want, it doesn't bother me. I'm trying to help you, I'm trying to tell you be careful, the way you talk to me, you are imbued with certain beliefs and maybe you shouldn't.
You can't regain your objectivity, you can't reconsider things from a new angle by saying to yourself, what is really possible through all of this? What can I deduce from all this? You are holding yourself back because you already have what you have acquired, you already have baggage which means that there are options that you forbid yourself, without even realizing it.
(Q - Nabil: Ah okay, so the key would be to do research, to... that's what you mean, that's...)
MB: The acquired knowledge would be to say, how could we conceive the answers to these enigmas, we have been submitting enigmas to you for 30 years, for a certain number of years, you have been working on them, you have found nothing. Good. So today, there is a pester on duty, me in this case, who tells you that you have to reconsider everything, how can you do it? Well, you can say to yourself, I'm ignoring everything that I've considered to be a given until today and I'm going back to the thing, and if I reread the riddles in a stupid, basic, primary way, what solutions can I bring to these puzzles with a fresh, basic look?
How do I orient myself, how do I do, what do I conclude from this, where do I go, what happens? But there are very, very few people who manage to do it. There are almost daily debates on this discord where people say, yeah but Becker this, Becker that. but he's not a researcher, he hasn't looked, he can't understand what's going on, what has to be stopped, all that has to be stopped. I have to tell you, at a given moment, we have a game, we have had puzzles for 30 years, everyone is wandering around, no one has found anything, we take things from a different angle, we become neutral again and we we analyze and look and try to understand, without at any time letting ourselves be influenced by history, by the history, by the convictions of one or the other, the assertions of one or the other. And it is extremely difficult, I am well aware of that.
MB: Nabil, you will listen to yourself again in the vocal recording, and you will see that you are completely affirmative at the start of your intervention, you affirm, you begin with an affirmation, so you are translating to me your personal conviction.
(Q - Nabil: No, in fact, I have it because yes, there you go, I said that because I have the feeling that I can find the origin.)
MB: Yes, but you say that because you are not objective.
(Q - Nabil: No but if I do, I know of course, but it's an idea that I have, I tell myself that...)< br />
MB: I have been telling you for months, I have been killing myself telling you for months, start again, reconsider all that from an objective angle, stop operating with your convictions, they are not good.
(Q - Nabil: No no, but in fact from what I understood, it was just to say…)
MB: You didn't find Nabil, so your beliefs are not good.
(Q - Nabil: Yes of course)
MB: Take it again in an objective way, do not assert, but there you have…
(Q - Nabil: In fact, I say that because if we have to find the origin of the expression…)
MB: 5 minutes ago, you didn't tell me “if” you said, it's revealing, I mean that in your head you have convictions that prevent you from finding a certain form of objectivity. It's not anything else. I don't care, personally, you can speak as you want, you can express yourself as you want, it doesn't bother me. I'm trying to help you, I'm trying to tell you be careful, the way you talk to me, you are imbued with certain beliefs and maybe you shouldn't.
You can't regain your objectivity, you can't reconsider things from a new angle by saying to yourself, what is really possible through all of this? What can I deduce from all this? You are holding yourself back because you already have what you have acquired, you already have baggage which means that there are options that you forbid yourself, without even realizing it.
(Q - Nabil: Ah okay, so the key would be to do research, to... that's what you mean, that's...)
MB: The acquired knowledge would be to say, how could we conceive the answers to these enigmas, we have been submitting enigmas to you for 30 years, for a certain number of years, you have been working on them, you have found nothing. Good. So today, there is a pester on duty, me in this case, who tells you that you have to reconsider everything, how can you do it? Well, you can say to yourself, I'm ignoring everything that I've considered to be a given until today and I'm going back to the thing, and if I reread the riddles in a stupid, basic, primary way, what solutions can I bring to these puzzles with a fresh, basic look?
How do I orient myself, how do I do, what do I conclude from this, where do I go, what happens? But there are very, very few people who manage to do it. There are almost daily debates on this discord where people say, yeah but Becker this, Becker that. but he's not a researcher, he hasn't looked, he can't understand what's going on, what has to be stopped, all that has to be stopped. I have to tell you, at a given moment, we have a game, we have had puzzles for 30 years, everyone is wandering around, no one has found anything, we take things from a different angle, we become neutral again and we we analyze and look and try to understand, without at any time letting ourselves be influenced by history, by the history, by the convictions of one or the other, the assertions of one or the other. And it is extremely difficult, I am well aware of that.