(Q – bioposis: I hear what you say about madits, I won't hide from you that having spent several years studying them and it was a mistake I admit, I couldn't
know it but some had understood it, my question would refocus more on the enigmas, we mentioned in previous vocals, an IS more on the negative sides, to remove false reasoning, bad approaches to hunting, I would not speak
of the B, but on the 530 could you not consider an IS of the style, this charade, we decipher it for the first time and we hear no more about it or then we should come back to it, is the charade
in 530, we find a place to start the game, it's the opening, couldn't you say in an IS we're not coming back)
MB : My first response is to tell you that the many hours I spend in voice allow me to completely capture what is going on in your heads, the players taken collectively I am starting to understand this type of questioning, I understand your question completely, are there several levels, should I come back to it, I understand very well what you are talking to me about, the 2nd element of the answer is to say so far the method which was used by Max Valentin, I'm not even talking about the madits anymore, but about the IS, these famous cryptic IS, a bit of a pirouette, I don't want to do that, so in parallel with the time I spend with you, I have a continuous reflection (bioposis: we are all in the same world), yes there you go. The real question I ask myself is how I should do it, should I also do IS or do I arrive, because of the knowledge, the empathy that I have with the players, am I able to dialogue with the players differently, am I able to bring them elements in another way than these IS written as enigmas, enigmatic, cryptic, the scope of these IS is not very big, can't I find another way, I thought about the visuals but not that, I'm trying to, I made the decision to put in place elements that will allow me, which I could use if I wanted to communicate in a different way, I'm in the process of setting it up. I am creating a tool that will allow me to provide elements in an encrypted, encrypted way, I don't know how to say it, but not in the same way that Max did. Because you understand that if I do it, somehow I validate the previous IS, I repeat a process that was used. I'm trying to find a way to provide these little clarifications, we've already eliminated a lot of erroneous elements. I'm in the process of putting these first tools in place and then I continue to think about everything I can use to do so. We are talking about the near future, I have set myself a mission, the pawns must be in place fairly quickly. We will say that 30 years is a close deadline by which I would like things to be in place. I would like to do it in a different context than whatever has set you up.
MB : My first response is to tell you that the many hours I spend in voice allow me to completely capture what is going on in your heads, the players taken collectively I am starting to understand this type of questioning, I understand your question completely, are there several levels, should I come back to it, I understand very well what you are talking to me about, the 2nd element of the answer is to say so far the method which was used by Max Valentin, I'm not even talking about the madits anymore, but about the IS, these famous cryptic IS, a bit of a pirouette, I don't want to do that, so in parallel with the time I spend with you, I have a continuous reflection (bioposis: we are all in the same world), yes there you go. The real question I ask myself is how I should do it, should I also do IS or do I arrive, because of the knowledge, the empathy that I have with the players, am I able to dialogue with the players differently, am I able to bring them elements in another way than these IS written as enigmas, enigmatic, cryptic, the scope of these IS is not very big, can't I find another way, I thought about the visuals but not that, I'm trying to, I made the decision to put in place elements that will allow me, which I could use if I wanted to communicate in a different way, I'm in the process of setting it up. I am creating a tool that will allow me to provide elements in an encrypted, encrypted way, I don't know how to say it, but not in the same way that Max did. Because you understand that if I do it, somehow I validate the previous IS, I repeat a process that was used. I'm trying to find a way to provide these little clarifications, we've already eliminated a lot of erroneous elements. I'm in the process of putting these first tools in place and then I continue to think about everything I can use to do so. We are talking about the near future, I have set myself a mission, the pawns must be in place fairly quickly. We will say that 30 years is a close deadline by which I would like things to be in place. I would like to do it in a different context than whatever has set you up.