(Q - ??: A question a little less vague perhaps than the last two I mean. I would just like to come back to the expression. There are some cool people who have deduced that the
expression could not be in the labels of the puzzles because you said that it was in the texts Do we agree that we can also keep the labels to search for this expression or not at all?)<
/u>
(Q - ??: Do you mean the titles?)
MB: The labels? The texts ? What are you talking to me about here? I'm talking about the text of the riddles, the wording of the riddles, I don't know what term you want to use?
(Q - ??: Yes yes I mean the titles. The titles are part of it too, do we agree?)
MB: Well there you go, everything is part of it yes.
(Q - ??: No but it’s to clarify because there was a debate on that at one point.)
MB: No, I'm talking about the text of the puzzles, so that obviously includes the title. My comment, I would say, on the way in which Max Valentin wrote all of this, is to say indeed, there is an extremely literary component, there is a whole part of the texts which must be considered from a literary angle. That is to say, the words are there to provoke something in the reader. Then there is another part of the texts which is much more technical, where you have to get down to the hard stuff, you have to analyze the text very precisely to deduce something from it. Some of it encryption, some of it whatever you want. But there is a whole literary component which is there to lull the reader, to take him into a universe, to let him think that this is that. So.
(Q - ??: Do you mean the titles?)
MB: The labels? The texts ? What are you talking to me about here? I'm talking about the text of the riddles, the wording of the riddles, I don't know what term you want to use?
(Q - ??: Yes yes I mean the titles. The titles are part of it too, do we agree?)
MB: Well there you go, everything is part of it yes.
(Q - ??: No but it’s to clarify because there was a debate on that at one point.)
MB: No, I'm talking about the text of the puzzles, so that obviously includes the title. My comment, I would say, on the way in which Max Valentin wrote all of this, is to say indeed, there is an extremely literary component, there is a whole part of the texts which must be considered from a literary angle. That is to say, the words are there to provoke something in the reader. Then there is another part of the texts which is much more technical, where you have to get down to the hard stuff, you have to analyze the text very precisely to deduce something from it. Some of it encryption, some of it whatever you want. But there is a whole literary component which is there to lull the reader, to take him into a universe, to let him think that this is that. So.