(Q – jeanlebon: many contradictions compared to the madits. you affirmed that the ISs and those of the TDF were good, but the other ISs were perhaps lies. Your opinion compared to the other ISs
than TDF?)
MB : What you need to know is that I was not informed of the IS, Max did what he wanted. The only ones he knows are the 4 that he illustrated, they don't add anything, they're totally basic, they don't add anything to the hunt. The TDF IS are precise and they can't talk bullshit. The perverse effect of these IS is that it distracts even more. Only someone with a personal approach can find it. There are plenty of people who have had moments of personal approach, who have found lots of things but at one point things go wrong because there were lots of things, doubt sets in and we lose our footing, we lose ourselves. says well no...and we stop thinking with our heads and we start doing statistics, no one else thinks like that, then we're screwed. For those I know, they are supposed to reinforce our resolutions. This helps to reinforce certain deductions on elements of the puzzles. I don't know the others, I don't want to bother with them and the parallel with the madits makes me say that the less we talk about them, the less digressions there are around the enigmas, the more we are sure of finding.
MB : What you need to know is that I was not informed of the IS, Max did what he wanted. The only ones he knows are the 4 that he illustrated, they don't add anything, they're totally basic, they don't add anything to the hunt. The TDF IS are precise and they can't talk bullshit. The perverse effect of these IS is that it distracts even more. Only someone with a personal approach can find it. There are plenty of people who have had moments of personal approach, who have found lots of things but at one point things go wrong because there were lots of things, doubt sets in and we lose our footing, we lose ourselves. says well no...and we stop thinking with our heads and we start doing statistics, no one else thinks like that, then we're screwed. For those I know, they are supposed to reinforce our resolutions. This helps to reinforce certain deductions on elements of the puzzles. I don't know the others, I don't want to bother with them and the parallel with the madits makes me say that the less we talk about them, the less digressions there are around the enigmas, the more we are sure of finding.