(Q - Candela: I am convinced because I have commented on a hundred coincidences, it's not it's not 2 or 3 coincidences like the tracks that I see passing by, it's more
'a hundred coincidences....)
(Q - nlc: but max was human we just repeated it and he has already said it 10,000 times Michel...)
MB: on the chapter of coincidences, there are coincidences for some of my paintings which are truly mind-blowing. I say that I cannot say it, as it would give major clues, which I cannot do, but there are coincidences, they are only coincidences but they are still mind-blowing so we cannot not reason on the basis of coincidences, we must reason on the basis of deductions certainly not coincidences, at a given moment when a riddle is cracked we say this is it, it cannot be anything else it must be that. But if we try with coincidences we start to enter a dangerous zone.
(Q - Candela: simply the key which is in the left hand I regret, it is not in the specifications, but how can I say in the 560 it is also a pencil which is held by a left hand and the left hand it is extremely important, it is this which allows us to know the name of the becalmed nave it is not a small matter I regret!)
MB: Candela, you are talking to me, who am the author of the paintings and you want to tell me what I put in my paintings? I put in my tables what is in the specifications, the rest is fine!
(Q - Candela can't think that you painted your left hand because it was a model for you...)
MB: but Candela doesn't have to think, we don't have to think, I say what I did, you don't have to think, you have to listen to what I tell you or else you take me for a liar ok, don't listen to me anymore, but if you believe me if I say that then it's true and
why would I tell you something else, you have the specifications, you have the author of the table who tells you I have
not with my right hand so I held the key with my left hand, what more do you need?
(Q: nlc: this calls his track into question...)
MB: but I know that this calls into question his trail, but he is not the only one, he is not the only one if the trails were not called into question, that means that the owl would never be found, in the current state of things and taking into account the years that have passed, there is a moment when this process of certainties becomes completely deleterious, it screws everyone up, you are far too stuck in your certainties to being able to progress, you can no longer progress, you are completely locked in by coincidences, by certainties, you are surrounded by certainties and coincidences, you can no longer move.
I try to be honest with everyone, it's not because you are so convinced and you want to convince others that I should ignore you or leave you aside, that's why I allow myself to answer you, I hope not to shock you by doing so but sincerely I am surprised by such persistence. {silence] you too apparently.
(Q - nlc: there are tracks that will collapse but it's a blessing in disguise...)
MB: we are on a forum, we are on an exchange zone, it cannot be a platform to try to convince as many people as possible, we have to debate and I think, well I don't think so, now knowing the details of all the solutions, great solution, etc., it is obvious that someone who arrives at a consistent level of certainty, does not need to look for 150 tons of coincidences, when I say the solutions these are the solutions it is not coincidences are solutions.
(Q - nlc: yes they take up a few pages, if these coincidences were voluntary, it would take 200 pages...)
MB: exactly, exactly, I am I, I still make it my duty, that's why I'm taking the liberty of intervening, I'm sorry but I make it my duty to refocus the debate a little.
(Q - nlc: but max was human we just repeated it and he has already said it 10,000 times Michel...)
MB: on the chapter of coincidences, there are coincidences for some of my paintings which are truly mind-blowing. I say that I cannot say it, as it would give major clues, which I cannot do, but there are coincidences, they are only coincidences but they are still mind-blowing so we cannot not reason on the basis of coincidences, we must reason on the basis of deductions certainly not coincidences, at a given moment when a riddle is cracked we say this is it, it cannot be anything else it must be that. But if we try with coincidences we start to enter a dangerous zone.
(Q - Candela: simply the key which is in the left hand I regret, it is not in the specifications, but how can I say in the 560 it is also a pencil which is held by a left hand and the left hand it is extremely important, it is this which allows us to know the name of the becalmed nave it is not a small matter I regret!)
MB: Candela, you are talking to me, who am the author of the paintings and you want to tell me what I put in my paintings? I put in my tables what is in the specifications, the rest is fine!
(Q - Candela can't think that you painted your left hand because it was a model for you...)
MB: but Candela doesn't have to think, we don't have to think, I say what I did, you don't have to think, you have to listen to what I tell you or else you take me for a liar ok, don't listen to me anymore, but if you believe me if I say that then it's true and
why would I tell you something else, you have the specifications, you have the author of the table who tells you I have
not with my right hand so I held the key with my left hand, what more do you need?
(Q: nlc: this calls his track into question...)
MB: but I know that this calls into question his trail, but he is not the only one, he is not the only one if the trails were not called into question, that means that the owl would never be found, in the current state of things and taking into account the years that have passed, there is a moment when this process of certainties becomes completely deleterious, it screws everyone up, you are far too stuck in your certainties to being able to progress, you can no longer progress, you are completely locked in by coincidences, by certainties, you are surrounded by certainties and coincidences, you can no longer move.
I try to be honest with everyone, it's not because you are so convinced and you want to convince others that I should ignore you or leave you aside, that's why I allow myself to answer you, I hope not to shock you by doing so but sincerely I am surprised by such persistence. {silence] you too apparently.
(Q - nlc: there are tracks that will collapse but it's a blessing in disguise...)
MB: we are on a forum, we are on an exchange zone, it cannot be a platform to try to convince as many people as possible, we have to debate and I think, well I don't think so, now knowing the details of all the solutions, great solution, etc., it is obvious that someone who arrives at a consistent level of certainty, does not need to look for 150 tons of coincidences, when I say the solutions these are the solutions it is not coincidences are solutions.
(Q - nlc: yes they take up a few pages, if these coincidences were voluntary, it would take 200 pages...)
MB: exactly, exactly, I am I, I still make it my duty, that's why I'm taking the liberty of intervening, I'm sorry but I make it my duty to refocus the debate a little.