(Q - nlc: you said at one point that roughly speaking, a large part of researchers think they have the right starting point and the right ending point and that the real question to ask was why and
there you were interrupted, but the real question of why the majority of researchers, whether it is true or not, think they have the right beginning and the right finish, I wanted to ask you if it was possible to pick up where you
were you arrested?)
MB: We’ll try! As I can try to situate myself, it's not necessarily easy because I'm a fairly spontaneous person, sometimes impulsive, and when I sometimes land on vocals, it's because I want to say stuff, because what I see in written exchanges, that there are things that are said that I don't like or that's it, so it's not always good, it's not always well premeditated, well calculated, well analyzed, there is a lot of spontaneity in me, don't blame me, but as I can relate to what you have just said, I believe that the idea which was mine at that moment- there, was to say why do you believe that if everyone is sure of their departure, if many in any case are sure of their departure, sure of their arrival, why do you believe that no one has found [inaudible] why believe - you know that many do not go to the same place (Inaudible] there is no clearly established consensus, neither on the area, nor on the cache obviously.
There are very diverse places in France, very diverse and varied areas, so why do you think this is happening and my observation today is to see if we are indeed having fun peeling madits, which is an infinitely interesting, exciting sport, you can find everything, absolutely everything and its opposite and that's what strikes me the most, that's what allows me to say that there is an effect of filling which is a major effect in the madits, we are on hours of minitel, rather than on elements of assistance to the researchers, it was a question of answering a lot of questions and for a lot of hours to gain a lot of 'money, what I'm saying is a bit dirty, I know it well, I know it's not nice for Max, but hey at the time there was business to be done, it was still necessary to get by, the first publishing company went bankrupt etc., I mean all these teams were not rolling in gold, so there was a concern to make money and this minitel worked a lot compared to that.
And aside from that, when I read..., when I am interested in more in-depth, more detailed, more precise, longer, more consistent stories, I say to myself what the hell, how would I react? if I were a researcher, without knowing the solutions by reading this, when I see the examples, I'll tell you this in bulk because I didn't remember them by heart, but the alignments with I don't know what, the Arc de Triomphe or I don't know what, and when the curses, the answers go in the direction of "imagine that", or "to make a comparison but of course it's not a clue", I I tell myself, but I read 10 of them like that and I'm freaking out, I don't know where I live anymore, and therefore, if we take some of these curses, if we take what suits us, if we eliminate what bothers us, we can validate all kinds of hypotheses.
That's my real job today, it's to go against that, without demolishing the game, it's to ensure that we stop allowing ourselves to explain everything, to imagine everything, to everything justify under the pretext that there is a said number, of such and such a date which says that...
Did I answer your question?
(Q - nlc: largely...)
MB: the guy isn't happy, he didn't get what he wanted!
(Q - nlc: no, what I wanted was an answer and so I got it...)
MB: I think that's it, it's my permanent problem at the moment because it's a thing, it's a bouillabaisse that's really difficult to handle, like I do with all that! What do I do with this stuff?
MB: We’ll try! As I can try to situate myself, it's not necessarily easy because I'm a fairly spontaneous person, sometimes impulsive, and when I sometimes land on vocals, it's because I want to say stuff, because what I see in written exchanges, that there are things that are said that I don't like or that's it, so it's not always good, it's not always well premeditated, well calculated, well analyzed, there is a lot of spontaneity in me, don't blame me, but as I can relate to what you have just said, I believe that the idea which was mine at that moment- there, was to say why do you believe that if everyone is sure of their departure, if many in any case are sure of their departure, sure of their arrival, why do you believe that no one has found [inaudible] why believe - you know that many do not go to the same place (Inaudible] there is no clearly established consensus, neither on the area, nor on the cache obviously.
There are very diverse places in France, very diverse and varied areas, so why do you think this is happening and my observation today is to see if we are indeed having fun peeling madits, which is an infinitely interesting, exciting sport, you can find everything, absolutely everything and its opposite and that's what strikes me the most, that's what allows me to say that there is an effect of filling which is a major effect in the madits, we are on hours of minitel, rather than on elements of assistance to the researchers, it was a question of answering a lot of questions and for a lot of hours to gain a lot of 'money, what I'm saying is a bit dirty, I know it well, I know it's not nice for Max, but hey at the time there was business to be done, it was still necessary to get by, the first publishing company went bankrupt etc., I mean all these teams were not rolling in gold, so there was a concern to make money and this minitel worked a lot compared to that.
And aside from that, when I read..., when I am interested in more in-depth, more detailed, more precise, longer, more consistent stories, I say to myself what the hell, how would I react? if I were a researcher, without knowing the solutions by reading this, when I see the examples, I'll tell you this in bulk because I didn't remember them by heart, but the alignments with I don't know what, the Arc de Triomphe or I don't know what, and when the curses, the answers go in the direction of "imagine that", or "to make a comparison but of course it's not a clue", I I tell myself, but I read 10 of them like that and I'm freaking out, I don't know where I live anymore, and therefore, if we take some of these curses, if we take what suits us, if we eliminate what bothers us, we can validate all kinds of hypotheses.
That's my real job today, it's to go against that, without demolishing the game, it's to ensure that we stop allowing ourselves to explain everything, to imagine everything, to everything justify under the pretext that there is a said number, of such and such a date which says that...
Did I answer your question?
(Q - nlc: largely...)
MB: the guy isn't happy, he didn't get what he wanted!
(Q - nlc: no, what I wanted was an answer and so I got it...)
MB: I think that's it, it's my permanent problem at the moment because it's a thing, it's a bouillabaisse that's really difficult to handle, like I do with all that! What do I do with this stuff?