(Q - nlc: you said the one who will find the solution, in fact he will perhaps not even bother to go to the form, because it will be so safe for him, that
he will only have one thing in mind, that is to go and dig, he will have no doubt about the great solution and yet there is a voice or two or three I don't know, you have confirmed.
that the doubt of the 520 was a real doubt, so in a way which consisted of having several possible options in the end, so that... we are sure, sure or there is still a doubt.
..?)
MB: doubt is like light, everyone has their own idea about it, what I believe is that the mechanism of the super solution, I would prefer to say at the limit of the solution, because in fact it That's it, the mechanism of the solution is so, how shall I say this, particular, it has never been imagined by anyone, that the day someone has this famous trigger that I'm talking about, they will say to themselves and if it was that, and seeing that ah well yes it gives something, I think that here we completely escape the logic of saying I have doubts, I don't have doubts.
The doubt that I am talking about and that Max Valentin was probably talking about at the level of the solution, the last solution, the super solution, this doubt is the one which consists of saying, well I understood, I have just understood a something that no one understood, what do I do with it. There there will actually be a little doubt about how to use what we have understood and this doubt will very quickly disappear because there is logic, because there are things which will mean that ok we take options, the doubt is eliminated and then we say well there it is.
Indeed there is doubt but ultimately we are not either, doubt does not necessarily constitute a complete questioning, this is also where we must be careful in the terms we use. The doubt is to say I arrive at a crossroads, do I go left or right, it happened to me in a car when I lived in Lyon, when it was foggy and we could see not 10 meters away, to have to get out of my car to read the signs, we have a doubt, we no longer know which way we should turn, but we will read the signs, we will understand something then we will say well well I'm going that way, that's it.
It's at this level, we are in a completely viable, manageable and bearable doubt, we are not in a deep metaphysical doubt where we say to ourselves who am I...
(Q - nlc: you said the figures, there is only one possibility, it is impossible to be able to associate them with anything else, if we think that it is possible it is that it's false and so that's why it's the story of doubt, well...)
MB: no but it is a doubt, it is a completely manageable doubt which does not interfere with the solution itself, this doubt will occur. I mean when we understood the trigger, when we had the trigger, there are still some questions to ask ourselves, there are still things to assimilate but what happens, what happens, there is no no need to talk about it for hours, it will happen.
MB: doubt is like light, everyone has their own idea about it, what I believe is that the mechanism of the super solution, I would prefer to say at the limit of the solution, because in fact it That's it, the mechanism of the solution is so, how shall I say this, particular, it has never been imagined by anyone, that the day someone has this famous trigger that I'm talking about, they will say to themselves and if it was that, and seeing that ah well yes it gives something, I think that here we completely escape the logic of saying I have doubts, I don't have doubts.
The doubt that I am talking about and that Max Valentin was probably talking about at the level of the solution, the last solution, the super solution, this doubt is the one which consists of saying, well I understood, I have just understood a something that no one understood, what do I do with it. There there will actually be a little doubt about how to use what we have understood and this doubt will very quickly disappear because there is logic, because there are things which will mean that ok we take options, the doubt is eliminated and then we say well there it is.
Indeed there is doubt but ultimately we are not either, doubt does not necessarily constitute a complete questioning, this is also where we must be careful in the terms we use. The doubt is to say I arrive at a crossroads, do I go left or right, it happened to me in a car when I lived in Lyon, when it was foggy and we could see not 10 meters away, to have to get out of my car to read the signs, we have a doubt, we no longer know which way we should turn, but we will read the signs, we will understand something then we will say well well I'm going that way, that's it.
It's at this level, we are in a completely viable, manageable and bearable doubt, we are not in a deep metaphysical doubt where we say to ourselves who am I...
(Q - nlc: you said the figures, there is only one possibility, it is impossible to be able to associate them with anything else, if we think that it is possible it is that it's false and so that's why it's the story of doubt, well...)
MB: no but it is a doubt, it is a completely manageable doubt which does not interfere with the solution itself, this doubt will occur. I mean when we understood the trigger, when we had the trigger, there are still some questions to ask ourselves, there are still things to assimilate but what happens, what happens, there is no no need to talk about it for hours, it will happen.