(Q - Bioposis: on the first 9, since you talked about the 9+2, you told us for the first 9, there is no common thread, martingale, methods,
of instructions, which would allow us to progress precisely in these first 9 But you tell us about a story all the same, which we must read, and that the puzzles follow each other logically, and here I admit that.
I have difficulty understanding this answer?)
MB: Well I think that when we say “the puzzles follow each other logically”... Do I need to say something else? Frankly ? Honestly?
The story, when I talk about a story, listen, there are things that you will understand in hindsight. If you're the one who finds the owl, even if it's someone else, you'll follow the trick. And then at some point, you will say to yourself “well yes, yes, okay, all right”. There is a logical sequence. If there was no logic, then things would start to get really serious! No, there is a logical sequence in the puzzles, there is no doubt about that.
Afterwards I think I was quite heavy-handed to the point that some people suspected me of wanting to settle scores. I've been pretty heavy-handed about what I think of Max Valentin's character, about the way he worked. I insisted, but I did not insist as part of a personal approach, I insisted as part of a necessity to convince the owls. And I continue to insist on this, namely that, indeed, there is a logic in the enigmas and indeed, in parallel, there is, in quotation marks, “a little story”. But there you go, it was mentioned a little in the story of Father Mehu, there is a story, it's the little presentation, it's the first. This is why the story of Father Méhus is interesting, it is the first presentation, the first introduction that Max had written for his hunt, it is always the same hunt, we always talk about the same cache , we always talk about the same location, so the puzzles are the same, they lead to the same location. The first story he told was Father Méhus, but overall there is a logical sequence in the enigmas. And then, yes, it tells a little story. And there you go, but there is nothing revolutionary to look for in that. Logic is the chain of puzzles.
(Q - Bioposis: It was this term “little story” that bothered me… well, that appealed to me.)
MB: Yeah, but there is obviously... We are still in something incredible, we are in a treasure hunt which, in quotation marks, initially had the name of “organized treasure hunt”. Today, there is an organizer, in this case the Chouette d'Or editions through me, but this game is totally disorganized, if you look closely, it is organized in the, let's say legal, sense of the term. , but in itself, it's such a crazy story. There have been so many twists and turns, there's so much stuff in there that you have to stay pretty cool, you can't get carried away. Yes, there is a little story in the puzzles. Yes, there is above all a logical sequence in the puzzles. Everything else is the story of the Golden Owl, it's the decorum, it's the romance, it's everything that has grafted itself around the golden owl. But if we think strictly about the enigmas, there is a logic in the enigmas and in the sequence of enigmas. That's it, that's the most important thing.
MB: Well I think that when we say “the puzzles follow each other logically”... Do I need to say something else? Frankly ? Honestly?
The story, when I talk about a story, listen, there are things that you will understand in hindsight. If you're the one who finds the owl, even if it's someone else, you'll follow the trick. And then at some point, you will say to yourself “well yes, yes, okay, all right”. There is a logical sequence. If there was no logic, then things would start to get really serious! No, there is a logical sequence in the puzzles, there is no doubt about that.
Afterwards I think I was quite heavy-handed to the point that some people suspected me of wanting to settle scores. I've been pretty heavy-handed about what I think of Max Valentin's character, about the way he worked. I insisted, but I did not insist as part of a personal approach, I insisted as part of a necessity to convince the owls. And I continue to insist on this, namely that, indeed, there is a logic in the enigmas and indeed, in parallel, there is, in quotation marks, “a little story”. But there you go, it was mentioned a little in the story of Father Mehu, there is a story, it's the little presentation, it's the first. This is why the story of Father Méhus is interesting, it is the first presentation, the first introduction that Max had written for his hunt, it is always the same hunt, we always talk about the same cache , we always talk about the same location, so the puzzles are the same, they lead to the same location. The first story he told was Father Méhus, but overall there is a logical sequence in the enigmas. And then, yes, it tells a little story. And there you go, but there is nothing revolutionary to look for in that. Logic is the chain of puzzles.
(Q - Bioposis: It was this term “little story” that bothered me… well, that appealed to me.)
MB: Yeah, but there is obviously... We are still in something incredible, we are in a treasure hunt which, in quotation marks, initially had the name of “organized treasure hunt”. Today, there is an organizer, in this case the Chouette d'Or editions through me, but this game is totally disorganized, if you look closely, it is organized in the, let's say legal, sense of the term. , but in itself, it's such a crazy story. There have been so many twists and turns, there's so much stuff in there that you have to stay pretty cool, you can't get carried away. Yes, there is a little story in the puzzles. Yes, there is above all a logical sequence in the puzzles. Everything else is the story of the Golden Owl, it's the decorum, it's the romance, it's everything that has grafted itself around the golden owl. But if we think strictly about the enigmas, there is a logic in the enigmas and in the sequence of enigmas. That's it, that's the most important thing.