(Q – Fabergé: you said, so, it's always about the numbers, because for me it's the numbers, that unlocks! You said that there were researchers who were turning
around, who, who were burning, but no one fits into the super solution How is this possible? It's a paradox that I find difficult to understand!
. But don't...We can't...we couldn't understand the trick but not understand the rest?)
MB: But it's very surprising because you have people who present theories which are extremely relevant and who conclude by saying, “Yeah but well after all, maybe that's not it”, and let's move on to something else. So indeed, there are among the cool people, there are people who hold extremely interesting, extremely relevant notions, but who don't even realize the relevance, what, of what they themselves emit, like being theories or suppositions. This is very surprising to me.
(Q – Fabergé: so it blocks the interpretation of… if they manage to….)
MB: No, it blocks the fact that I have the impression that very, very few owls, if any, or none are capable of saying “Here is my conviction, and I rely on that and I works on that.
And the paradox which means that, indeed, it is very difficult for you to grasp this notion... The paradox is that, I tell you clearly, without exception, all the people who on this Discord, affirm , demonstrate, and for some, are peremptory… All, without exception, fail.
And then there is a 2nd category, of course, I won't name anyone, but people who have an absolutely proven talent, to develop everything that would be conceivable or possible, so that by dint of envisioning, we drown the fish and we no longer know what is really interesting or not.
And I assure you that it is remarkable and I, frankly, I weigh my words exactly, I know exactly what I am telling you, and it is obvious on this discord.
And the more assertive people are, the more bullshit they say. And the more they open the debate, the more they say “yes, but we could imagine that, we could this, we could that”, and the more they drown the fish and the more they completely dilute the insight of some who are nevertheless very close to the truth what.
It's for me, who sees things from the outside, I assure you that for me, it's disturbing because I tell myself, but I'm not a psychologist, eh, I'm not someone who is capable of truly measuring the ins and outs of each person's behavior. And when I hear, when I read all this, I say to myself “but, damn good evening, but what a universe”. It’s a world apart, this golden owl. There are tenors who are there, who speak, who hold the spittoon for hours and who in fact produce a completely perverse effect, because they drown the fish, they dilute the thing and finally we no longer really know where. there are others who assert things for hours, who demonstrate things to us, who are peremptory, and who tell bullshit after bullshit. And I say to myself, but how, how to manage this, what?
(Q - Nabil: Michel, since you are not on vocal, you are talking about writings, you are not talking about people who are on vocal, since you are not listening to us on vocal?)
MB: No no, but I hear the questions people ask me when I'm in the vocals.
(Q - Nabil: but you can't talk about vocals but when you say “I see things on the discord”, you are talking about writings since when we chat in vocals.)< /u>
MB: Nabil Nabil…You are not a priest as far as I know. So I don't necessarily have to confess. You are a bunch of villains, trying to corner me at every turn. Wait, I'm not going to sit down at the table, am I?
MB: But it's very surprising because you have people who present theories which are extremely relevant and who conclude by saying, “Yeah but well after all, maybe that's not it”, and let's move on to something else. So indeed, there are among the cool people, there are people who hold extremely interesting, extremely relevant notions, but who don't even realize the relevance, what, of what they themselves emit, like being theories or suppositions. This is very surprising to me.
(Q – Fabergé: so it blocks the interpretation of… if they manage to….)
MB: No, it blocks the fact that I have the impression that very, very few owls, if any, or none are capable of saying “Here is my conviction, and I rely on that and I works on that.
And the paradox which means that, indeed, it is very difficult for you to grasp this notion... The paradox is that, I tell you clearly, without exception, all the people who on this Discord, affirm , demonstrate, and for some, are peremptory… All, without exception, fail.
And then there is a 2nd category, of course, I won't name anyone, but people who have an absolutely proven talent, to develop everything that would be conceivable or possible, so that by dint of envisioning, we drown the fish and we no longer know what is really interesting or not.
And I assure you that it is remarkable and I, frankly, I weigh my words exactly, I know exactly what I am telling you, and it is obvious on this discord.
And the more assertive people are, the more bullshit they say. And the more they open the debate, the more they say “yes, but we could imagine that, we could this, we could that”, and the more they drown the fish and the more they completely dilute the insight of some who are nevertheless very close to the truth what.
It's for me, who sees things from the outside, I assure you that for me, it's disturbing because I tell myself, but I'm not a psychologist, eh, I'm not someone who is capable of truly measuring the ins and outs of each person's behavior. And when I hear, when I read all this, I say to myself “but, damn good evening, but what a universe”. It’s a world apart, this golden owl. There are tenors who are there, who speak, who hold the spittoon for hours and who in fact produce a completely perverse effect, because they drown the fish, they dilute the thing and finally we no longer really know where. there are others who assert things for hours, who demonstrate things to us, who are peremptory, and who tell bullshit after bullshit. And I say to myself, but how, how to manage this, what?
(Q - Nabil: Michel, since you are not on vocal, you are talking about writings, you are not talking about people who are on vocal, since you are not listening to us on vocal?)
MB: No no, but I hear the questions people ask me when I'm in the vocals.
(Q - Nabil: but you can't talk about vocals but when you say “I see things on the discord”, you are talking about writings since when we chat in vocals.)< /u>
MB: Nabil Nabil…You are not a priest as far as I know. So I don't necessarily have to confess. You are a bunch of villains, trying to corner me at every turn. Wait, I'm not going to sit down at the table, am I?