(Q - Hogan: Michel, could you say, that this expression echoes our findings on the 989?)
MB: I have said so much, listen honestly in a few pages there are not 50 expressions, “good God of good God”. There aren't 50 of them, they can be counted on the fingers of one hand!
(Q - Hogan: No, I say that because ultimately with you we, we didn't discuss much about the findings that the owls report on the 989 and just the question was, what is this famous sentence can echo these findings, you can answer that it was a set, without answering precisely.)
MB: I told you, I maintain, we must remain consistent in our discussions, really, I want us to remain consistent. I am a very clean person. So, from the moment I affirm things, I affirm them and I will continue to affirm them. I have told you for a very long time, when we attack the last puzzles, when we attack what we usually call the super solution, there is a change of gear. This means that we change our way of reasoning and thinking. Are we no longer on the same agreement mechanisms?
From there, it is very obvious that everything that will be able to be found, imagined, designed beyond the first 9 enigmas, I believe that we are all quite clear today on this sequencing responds to something other than the usual decryptions, as well as the usual charades etc, which we acquired a taste for during the first 9 puzzles. There, we change gear.
MB: I have said so much, listen honestly in a few pages there are not 50 expressions, “good God of good God”. There aren't 50 of them, they can be counted on the fingers of one hand!
(Q - Hogan: No, I say that because ultimately with you we, we didn't discuss much about the findings that the owls report on the 989 and just the question was, what is this famous sentence can echo these findings, you can answer that it was a set, without answering precisely.)
MB: I told you, I maintain, we must remain consistent in our discussions, really, I want us to remain consistent. I am a very clean person. So, from the moment I affirm things, I affirm them and I will continue to affirm them. I have told you for a very long time, when we attack the last puzzles, when we attack what we usually call the super solution, there is a change of gear. This means that we change our way of reasoning and thinking. Are we no longer on the same agreement mechanisms?
From there, it is very obvious that everything that will be able to be found, imagined, designed beyond the first 9 enigmas, I believe that we are all quite clear today on this sequencing responds to something other than the usual decryptions, as well as the usual charades etc, which we acquired a taste for during the first 9 puzzles. There, we change gear.