(Q - ??: [Inaudible]...)
MB: it's very clearly different, I mean, if one day you mistake an old chapel for a crucifix, you're going to end up in an asylum, no no, it's serious. Yes yes, I understand, no but I understand well. Let's say that in relation to this whole aspect of things, therefore, no no, in relation to all these elements, we must still remember that it has been said, repeated and confirmed by myself that it is not there was no element linked to religion in the hunt.
(Q - ??: [Inaudible]...)
MB: No, there was a distinction. No, I answer the question, for me it is linked to religion. For me it is not linked to religion, for me, there are two aspects, there is an old chapel, there is the architectural aspect, and there is the religious aspect, which are two completely distinct, and therefore I think that it has been clearly established, indeed by Max before me, and I confirm it, that the architectural elements whatever they are, whether they are religious or non-religious elements , are to be considered as architectural elements. Or, let’s say, locations of architectural elements. If it is not the construction itself, it could be its location, in any case, it is not a question of religion.
On the other hand, when we start to talk about notions which are directly linked to religion, and potentially in correlation with a place, a construction which is architectural, at that moment, we are no longer in the hunt. There is no religious connotation in any of the elements of hunting.
(Q - ??: [Inaudible]...)
MB: Ah, but I am not excluding any religious building, if that is the question, we can take these buildings into account if we want to. As long as it's a reference point, that's it. That's exactly it.
MB: it's very clearly different, I mean, if one day you mistake an old chapel for a crucifix, you're going to end up in an asylum, no no, it's serious. Yes yes, I understand, no but I understand well. Let's say that in relation to this whole aspect of things, therefore, no no, in relation to all these elements, we must still remember that it has been said, repeated and confirmed by myself that it is not there was no element linked to religion in the hunt.
(Q - ??: [Inaudible]...)
MB: No, there was a distinction. No, I answer the question, for me it is linked to religion. For me it is not linked to religion, for me, there are two aspects, there is an old chapel, there is the architectural aspect, and there is the religious aspect, which are two completely distinct, and therefore I think that it has been clearly established, indeed by Max before me, and I confirm it, that the architectural elements whatever they are, whether they are religious or non-religious elements , are to be considered as architectural elements. Or, let’s say, locations of architectural elements. If it is not the construction itself, it could be its location, in any case, it is not a question of religion.
On the other hand, when we start to talk about notions which are directly linked to religion, and potentially in correlation with a place, a construction which is architectural, at that moment, we are no longer in the hunt. There is no religious connotation in any of the elements of hunting.
(Q - ??: [Inaudible]...)
MB: Ah, but I am not excluding any religious building, if that is the question, we can take these buildings into account if we want to. As long as it's a reference point, that's it. That's exactly it.