(Q - Flo: just to conclude on what I proposed to you: you went back to the great solution, you went back to what existed at the A2CO, very good, but it wasn't
not at all what it was about and here you say “Ok I can't say anything without deflowering, without providing other solutions”, either. But in this case, don't say that the nine are online because.
otherwise in this case, we can very well have an Additional Indication on the 9 which will not impact the super solution Or there is really something that I do not understand.
me, or we fill in again on the explanation of the super solution, but that is not what my intervention was about.)
MB : this is the big problem between you and me, my dear. That's the big problem, which is that you have, for a lot of owls, you have everything right under your nose. Can you hear me well? Right under your nose. And you don't want to see it. And you don't want to see it. And I'm trying to help you and you won't listen to me. This is terrifying to me.
(Q - Flo: in your own words, the help you provide is only supported by the last 2. So no, you can't say that. So I'm willing, you gave things in 600, etc. of course, but what you are saying, in your own words, is that your interventions, and what you are trying to do, concerns the last 2. So don't say that we don't want to. see it or that you are trying to put us on it because in that case, you would talk about the first 9 in a much more expansive way )
.
MB : one of the big problems that we have, you and I, is that many of you imagine, I am not asking you to admit it, many of you imagine that I settle my accounts with Max Valentin. And this “many of you” are screwing up. I have no score to settle with Max Valentin. Max Valentin is a virtual character. I am not settling any scores with Max Valentin. Régis Hauser is dead, I am not settling any scores with Régis Hauser. I have been trying for months and months to guide you on the perception you should have of the character of both Régis Hauser and Max Valentin. And very few of you take it into account.
You work hard at the puzzles. But whose riddles are they? Who wrote these riddles? That's the work of a cold case, it's how we analyze a situation, how we analyze a case by saying: “Who said what? Who wrote what ? Who was he ? How could it have worked?” And from the moment you admit that you had to deal with a talented advertiser, certainly, but a clever, clever, cunning one, from that moment on, you will understand better, you will see the enigmas from another angle. This is what I've been trying to do for over a year. This is what the majority of owls resist. This is what most of you don't want to hear when you say: “Yes, but Michel, he says that, but hey…”. But there is no good. Put this in mind, Michel Becker's remarks have nothing to do with either a settling of scores or with Max Valentin. I speak in my name, as I see things, as I discovered the solutions and as I think I can help the owls to return to a debate more in line with reality. And very few understood that. Very few understood it.
(Q - Flo: no problem. Just know that in what I told you, at no time did I compare you to Max Valentin, at no time did I try to make this comparison I don't even understand why we're talking about it here when ultimately it wasn't at all the spectrum of my question, but there's no problem, maybe we'll conclude here?)
MB : No, not at all. Ask me again, ask me the question again, so that I can answer it clearly.
(Q - Flo: so what I suggested to you is that you say that the Additional Indications, you cannot do any, even in painting, to confirm the super solution. In In any case, that's how I understood it. Very well, what I suggested was to respond to a problem that I was able to observe and which may be false in the first 9. is that people cannot reach this point of super solution that you describe since there is no confirmation Already there is no confirmation when we move forward My intervention was to say well, since. you don't want to talk about the first 9 or few, and making an Additional Indication as a super solution would detract from the game, so we can do one on the first 9 And at no point in this intervention, do I refer to d. 'other things. It's just... there we go, we're talking about the first 9 and we're discussing it. If it's not the case, it's not the case, no problem, but it wasn't about the. rest.)
MB : You imply in your question... Are you mentioning the fact that I could provide additional information relating to the first 9, whatever they may be, to possibly unlock the game?
MB : this is the big problem between you and me, my dear. That's the big problem, which is that you have, for a lot of owls, you have everything right under your nose. Can you hear me well? Right under your nose. And you don't want to see it. And you don't want to see it. And I'm trying to help you and you won't listen to me. This is terrifying to me.
(Q - Flo: in your own words, the help you provide is only supported by the last 2. So no, you can't say that. So I'm willing, you gave things in 600, etc. of course, but what you are saying, in your own words, is that your interventions, and what you are trying to do, concerns the last 2. So don't say that we don't want to. see it or that you are trying to put us on it because in that case, you would talk about the first 9 in a much more expansive way )
.
MB : one of the big problems that we have, you and I, is that many of you imagine, I am not asking you to admit it, many of you imagine that I settle my accounts with Max Valentin. And this “many of you” are screwing up. I have no score to settle with Max Valentin. Max Valentin is a virtual character. I am not settling any scores with Max Valentin. Régis Hauser is dead, I am not settling any scores with Régis Hauser. I have been trying for months and months to guide you on the perception you should have of the character of both Régis Hauser and Max Valentin. And very few of you take it into account.
You work hard at the puzzles. But whose riddles are they? Who wrote these riddles? That's the work of a cold case, it's how we analyze a situation, how we analyze a case by saying: “Who said what? Who wrote what ? Who was he ? How could it have worked?” And from the moment you admit that you had to deal with a talented advertiser, certainly, but a clever, clever, cunning one, from that moment on, you will understand better, you will see the enigmas from another angle. This is what I've been trying to do for over a year. This is what the majority of owls resist. This is what most of you don't want to hear when you say: “Yes, but Michel, he says that, but hey…”. But there is no good. Put this in mind, Michel Becker's remarks have nothing to do with either a settling of scores or with Max Valentin. I speak in my name, as I see things, as I discovered the solutions and as I think I can help the owls to return to a debate more in line with reality. And very few understood that. Very few understood it.
(Q - Flo: no problem. Just know that in what I told you, at no time did I compare you to Max Valentin, at no time did I try to make this comparison I don't even understand why we're talking about it here when ultimately it wasn't at all the spectrum of my question, but there's no problem, maybe we'll conclude here?)
MB : No, not at all. Ask me again, ask me the question again, so that I can answer it clearly.
(Q - Flo: so what I suggested to you is that you say that the Additional Indications, you cannot do any, even in painting, to confirm the super solution. In In any case, that's how I understood it. Very well, what I suggested was to respond to a problem that I was able to observe and which may be false in the first 9. is that people cannot reach this point of super solution that you describe since there is no confirmation Already there is no confirmation when we move forward My intervention was to say well, since. you don't want to talk about the first 9 or few, and making an Additional Indication as a super solution would detract from the game, so we can do one on the first 9 And at no point in this intervention, do I refer to d. 'other things. It's just... there we go, we're talking about the first 9 and we're discussing it. If it's not the case, it's not the case, no problem, but it wasn't about the. rest.)
MB : You imply in your question... Are you mentioning the fact that I could provide additional information relating to the first 9, whatever they may be, to possibly unlock the game?