(Q – Judie: but I think the file will be sent as a result. The 2nd question, it actually concerned a vocal which took place with some owls, they are not here today from
So I ask the question, they actually found the amalgamation that there can be between Michel Becker, organizer, and Michel Becker who makes jokes about nomics problematic.
Given that there is no real way to turn on a flashing light every time a response is made in the first or second degree, is there a plan to finally recreate a living room? of a nomic where we could ask questions because in fact, recently in particular the refrigerator has caused concern because as much as people understood that it was the term refrigerator which had passed into common terms, the photo of the in the fridge, it was only average.)
MB : I don't remember the photo with the fridge?
(Q - Syn: yes with it was your fridge Michel with your tattooed wife.)
MB : What is this story?
(Q – Judie: there is a little problem in fact, there are some owls who consider that either we are an organizer, or we, there you go, we laugh with the owls, but we can difficult to do both at the same time.)
MB : Okay, yes, yes, yes, I see that I am under control.
(Q – Judie: Afterwards it's not a question of control, it's a question of overinterpretation of words. But even puns on electricity, there is the term “ohm » which was noted, because on a map it can be a cave, well there you go, there are sometimes jokes that resonate with certain owls and. I wanted to know if there was something that would be done to fix that.)
MB : Well the first thing we should do is ask the owls not to make jokes on the discord. That wouldn't make me want to respond to them in the same tone at all.
(Q – Judie: Yes, so we agree on that, but the problem is…)
MB : it’s still a complicated debate, isn’t that Judie?
(Q – Judie: yes I know…)
(Q – Syn: and not to interpret everything either!)
(Q – Judie: the problem is that the owls, but the fact that the owls laugh is one thing, the fact that the organizer bounces back is another. That's where it actually becomes problematic No, it's not the end of the jokes, that's not the question. I'm also for Michel's jokes, I vote eh, there's no problem…)
(Q – Olivier: but who is it problematic for? Who has a problem with that?)
(Q - ??: yes, I admit who has a problem with that, what?)
(Q – Judie: I can’t give you the names
(Q – Syn: because that’s weird, anyway I think that every owl must take charge of themselves and know how to slap themselves when…)
(Q – Olivier: yeah, it’s still weird to say that the organizer isn’t allowed to laugh anyway, I find that a little weird.)
(Q – Judie: So I never said that, thank you…)
(Q – Syn: we understood, Judie we understood, Judie…)
(Q – Judie: Well obviously no, so you see, that’s the problem, is that even when I ask a question it’s overinterpreted you see…)
(Q – Syn: it's not in relation to you I was answering, it's in relation to the cool people who are asking the question, I'm talking about myself, that poses no problem to me, joke or no joke, it's It's up to me to settle down and know what's a joke, what's not a joke, if I overinterpret, that's my problem. And every owl should do the same.)
(Q – Judie: Precisely, that was the argument that I opposed to them vocally and the problem is that there are people who completely overinterpret every statement of Michel Becker, there are people who will interpret half of the words, others it's a quarter, others it will be... once it resonates you see, that's the problem?)
MB : Yeah, I know, but then I see hundreds of images, things, jokes, things going by. Well, I don't see them all, but I mean, the tone of this forum, of this discord, is to be quite relaxed, to be quite soft. Well when we laugh, we laugh, after some take it literally, yes it's a real question indeed.
So, should I stop myself from joking, should I create a second profile when I want to be funny, I disconnect from my sphinx and then I reconnect to a clown to say, now, I'm laughing.
(Q – Syn: I find that it's the same thing whether it's in chat, whether in vocals, people can't help but interpret so it will reduce the interpretations , they won't have the chats, but it will continue anyway with the vocals and even with the serious things that Michel will say.)
(Q – Aladore: no but hey here we are clearly in the overinterpretation of players and I personally find that it's super nice when Michel comes to rave with us, after that it bothers people because they want to take everything literally, that's one thing, now we must not kill this relationship that we have either, that's when Michel comes to do vocals, he comes to explain things to us, now when he comes on the discord to discuss with us, you don't have to take everything literally. There is a moment, you still have to impose limits on yourself. I agree with you Syn in saying that it is. it's also a lesson for us owls not to overinterpret too much and to know and continue to go crazy a little, since we remain in a game eh, it's above all a game, so we have to stop leaving What a peanut. Michel frankly I think that well afterwards, it's a minority of people who think that, and finally me, personally I find all your interventions super nice and finally for me there is no need to change this. good atmosphere.)
MB : I have no taboo on this. If it is necessary to change my attitude, I can change my attitude, but what I... at the same time as I listen to what is being said, I ask myself the question of knowing if ultimately, it is really healthy that the people who play this game take themselves so seriously, because ultimately that's a bit of what I have to criticize a lot of the people at A2CO and my detractors of yesteryear and today today and some of them who are publishing lots of things on the web, I'm not particularly thinking about the history of the trial but even apart from that, the historical players etc have made a lot of publications, of affirmations, of things.
And that really reveals that these people take themselves seriously, put forward theories that they try to demonstrate over the length of lines or over the length of sketches or whatever, taking themselves very, very seriously, I I understand that we are passionate about the game, I understand that we are involved in it, but at a given moment, indeed, where the debate becomes more delicate, it is when on one side or the other, we take ourselves seriously.
If at some point I no longer allow people to throw it at me in a humorous way like it happens every day on the discord, that means that I will start to take myself really seriously and that you shouldn't laugh with me at all and that's a bit what Judie is saying, is that there are people on the other side, who would like us not to laugh with them , that we remain very serious about the story of the owl.
Is it good, is it not good? I don't know, I don't have an opinion, I'm listening to you and I'm asking myself the question right now.
(Q – Belou: I say you have to live, yeah it’s no use afterwards too.
(Q – Aladore: no but after that it could be interesting…)
(Q – Belou: let go, Michel, everything is allowed, fridge, washing machine, fireplace, doormat...)
MB : No, the image of the fridge that I sent, it shouldn't have been terrible.
(Q – Belou: she’s on the show there, he sent the photo on Radio Chouette, look.)
(Q – Aladore: No but after that what we can possibly do is create a section or a special section in the discord or when you want for example to give us information on which you want us to meditate, well possibly you put it in this section and then afterward you continue to intervene on the other sections as you usually do, there is no problem with that either.)
MB : Yeah, yeah, ah but yes I see the photo of the refrigerator but it's not my wife at all eh.
It's a photo that I found on the web, I don't even know what it is anymore at the time, it made me laugh, I found it funny, a treasure that comes out of fridge. Well I said hey, it will make them laugh, but apparently not eh. Well, not everyone.
(Q – Uncle Nono: Hello, it's a question of recurrence, you see when you make a mistake on the fridge, the more the photo behind it is like Greenland, by dint of coming back, we say to ourselves there is a message, it's serious So it's a question of limits, we don't know where the limit of your joke and your…)< br />
MB : Greenland wasn't a joke eh, Greenland, I said it vocally as examples, but it wasn't a joke, eh?
(Q – Uncle Nono: No, no, but we understood that well, but for example, it’s also like the clue in the 5th edition who is there, who is not there , but who is there anyway what there is the same, we don't know what to expect and there are many who looked for the clue, in the book.)
MB : I'm going to have to get really serious then...
(Q – Judie: ultimately, there was still a debate…)
Given that there is no real way to turn on a flashing light every time a response is made in the first or second degree, is there a plan to finally recreate a living room? of a nomic where we could ask questions because in fact, recently in particular the refrigerator has caused concern because as much as people understood that it was the term refrigerator which had passed into common terms, the photo of the in the fridge, it was only average.)
MB : I don't remember the photo with the fridge?
(Q - Syn: yes with it was your fridge Michel with your tattooed wife.)
MB : What is this story?
(Q – Judie: there is a little problem in fact, there are some owls who consider that either we are an organizer, or we, there you go, we laugh with the owls, but we can difficult to do both at the same time.)
MB : Okay, yes, yes, yes, I see that I am under control.
(Q – Judie: Afterwards it's not a question of control, it's a question of overinterpretation of words. But even puns on electricity, there is the term “ohm » which was noted, because on a map it can be a cave, well there you go, there are sometimes jokes that resonate with certain owls and. I wanted to know if there was something that would be done to fix that.)
MB : Well the first thing we should do is ask the owls not to make jokes on the discord. That wouldn't make me want to respond to them in the same tone at all.
(Q – Judie: Yes, so we agree on that, but the problem is…)
MB : it’s still a complicated debate, isn’t that Judie?
(Q – Judie: yes I know…)
(Q – Syn: and not to interpret everything either!)
(Q – Judie: the problem is that the owls, but the fact that the owls laugh is one thing, the fact that the organizer bounces back is another. That's where it actually becomes problematic No, it's not the end of the jokes, that's not the question. I'm also for Michel's jokes, I vote eh, there's no problem…)
(Q – Olivier: but who is it problematic for? Who has a problem with that?)
(Q - ??: yes, I admit who has a problem with that, what?)
(Q – Judie: I can’t give you the names
(Q – Syn: because that’s weird, anyway I think that every owl must take charge of themselves and know how to slap themselves when…)
(Q – Olivier: yeah, it’s still weird to say that the organizer isn’t allowed to laugh anyway, I find that a little weird.)
(Q – Judie: So I never said that, thank you…)
(Q – Syn: we understood, Judie we understood, Judie…)
(Q – Judie: Well obviously no, so you see, that’s the problem, is that even when I ask a question it’s overinterpreted you see…)
(Q – Syn: it's not in relation to you I was answering, it's in relation to the cool people who are asking the question, I'm talking about myself, that poses no problem to me, joke or no joke, it's It's up to me to settle down and know what's a joke, what's not a joke, if I overinterpret, that's my problem. And every owl should do the same.)
(Q – Judie: Precisely, that was the argument that I opposed to them vocally and the problem is that there are people who completely overinterpret every statement of Michel Becker, there are people who will interpret half of the words, others it's a quarter, others it will be... once it resonates you see, that's the problem?)
MB : Yeah, I know, but then I see hundreds of images, things, jokes, things going by. Well, I don't see them all, but I mean, the tone of this forum, of this discord, is to be quite relaxed, to be quite soft. Well when we laugh, we laugh, after some take it literally, yes it's a real question indeed.
So, should I stop myself from joking, should I create a second profile when I want to be funny, I disconnect from my sphinx and then I reconnect to a clown to say, now, I'm laughing.
(Q – Syn: I find that it's the same thing whether it's in chat, whether in vocals, people can't help but interpret so it will reduce the interpretations , they won't have the chats, but it will continue anyway with the vocals and even with the serious things that Michel will say.)
(Q – Aladore: no but hey here we are clearly in the overinterpretation of players and I personally find that it's super nice when Michel comes to rave with us, after that it bothers people because they want to take everything literally, that's one thing, now we must not kill this relationship that we have either, that's when Michel comes to do vocals, he comes to explain things to us, now when he comes on the discord to discuss with us, you don't have to take everything literally. There is a moment, you still have to impose limits on yourself. I agree with you Syn in saying that it is. it's also a lesson for us owls not to overinterpret too much and to know and continue to go crazy a little, since we remain in a game eh, it's above all a game, so we have to stop leaving What a peanut. Michel frankly I think that well afterwards, it's a minority of people who think that, and finally me, personally I find all your interventions super nice and finally for me there is no need to change this. good atmosphere.)
MB : I have no taboo on this. If it is necessary to change my attitude, I can change my attitude, but what I... at the same time as I listen to what is being said, I ask myself the question of knowing if ultimately, it is really healthy that the people who play this game take themselves so seriously, because ultimately that's a bit of what I have to criticize a lot of the people at A2CO and my detractors of yesteryear and today today and some of them who are publishing lots of things on the web, I'm not particularly thinking about the history of the trial but even apart from that, the historical players etc have made a lot of publications, of affirmations, of things.
And that really reveals that these people take themselves seriously, put forward theories that they try to demonstrate over the length of lines or over the length of sketches or whatever, taking themselves very, very seriously, I I understand that we are passionate about the game, I understand that we are involved in it, but at a given moment, indeed, where the debate becomes more delicate, it is when on one side or the other, we take ourselves seriously.
If at some point I no longer allow people to throw it at me in a humorous way like it happens every day on the discord, that means that I will start to take myself really seriously and that you shouldn't laugh with me at all and that's a bit what Judie is saying, is that there are people on the other side, who would like us not to laugh with them , that we remain very serious about the story of the owl.
Is it good, is it not good? I don't know, I don't have an opinion, I'm listening to you and I'm asking myself the question right now.
(Q – Belou: I say you have to live, yeah it’s no use afterwards too.
(Q – Aladore: no but after that it could be interesting…)
(Q – Belou: let go, Michel, everything is allowed, fridge, washing machine, fireplace, doormat...)
MB : No, the image of the fridge that I sent, it shouldn't have been terrible.
(Q – Belou: she’s on the show there, he sent the photo on Radio Chouette, look.)
(Q – Aladore: No but after that what we can possibly do is create a section or a special section in the discord or when you want for example to give us information on which you want us to meditate, well possibly you put it in this section and then afterward you continue to intervene on the other sections as you usually do, there is no problem with that either.)
MB : Yeah, yeah, ah but yes I see the photo of the refrigerator but it's not my wife at all eh.
It's a photo that I found on the web, I don't even know what it is anymore at the time, it made me laugh, I found it funny, a treasure that comes out of fridge. Well I said hey, it will make them laugh, but apparently not eh. Well, not everyone.
(Q – Uncle Nono: Hello, it's a question of recurrence, you see when you make a mistake on the fridge, the more the photo behind it is like Greenland, by dint of coming back, we say to ourselves there is a message, it's serious So it's a question of limits, we don't know where the limit of your joke and your…)< br />
MB : Greenland wasn't a joke eh, Greenland, I said it vocally as examples, but it wasn't a joke, eh?
(Q – Uncle Nono: No, no, but we understood that well, but for example, it’s also like the clue in the 5th edition who is there, who is not there , but who is there anyway what there is the same, we don't know what to expect and there are many who looked for the clue, in the book.)
MB : I'm going to have to get really serious then...
(Q – Judie: ultimately, there was still a debate…)