Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

02/08/2022 - Enregistrement 35 - part 1 - 31:50 : Hunting literature and design

(Q – bioposis: no literary reference – literature but the use of words, yes it’s the 11 enigmas)/u>

MB : What is interesting in literature is not, it is not the literary references, I am not talking about that at all. When I say that Max was literary, that means that he weighed the words, he used the words for a particular purpose by saying to himself I am going to produce this effect, this word is going to have this impact and he chose the words according to of that, as he did when he wrote advertising text. We use such a word, adjective to say that the product is this, is that. These texts are the result of brainstorming sessions where the words are tinkered with in all directions, the synonyms sought, the adjectives, the adverbs, how we turn the thing, everything is analyzed and he had plenty of time to do it and it's for this reason I say that he was a literary man and that the work he did was mainly literary work.
The words are chosen to introduce a little mystery, doubt. When he says in interviews, it makes me laugh, when he says I regret having made too many false leads, I pee myself from laughing, he doesn't care about the world. He had not imagined a single false trail. He had imagined words which can have a double meaning, which can induce, but no clue, there are no clues, you make a mistake you go back but there is no possibility of false track, not a single one in the golden owl.

(Q – ??: what do you mean by false trail, it’s a debate that exists on the Discord, I’m taking an example from the 530, by dissecting the rhymes we can fall on Agen and by resolving the charade we come across Bourges? It's typically a trap where a player can rush into, I hear that there was no intention from Max, it's a situation which arrives)

MB : I completely understand your question. I have a different approach, a different vocabulary than you because I don't have the same data. I will try to explain to you. How do you think a guy who has spent years looking for the martingale, the thing that will make him earn lots of money, can react but who still rows to make ends meet. That’s Régis Hauser, he had his small office in Paris, communications agency,….he was all alone. This guy has an idea, he takes 15 years to put it together and the moment it starts, it starts like hell. For a moment he won more money than ever before, the minitel was the jackpot. And he finds himself with a court of courtiers who send him ideas, theories and who explain to him how they understand what he himself wrote as being an enigma, how they manage to find different solutions. The guy said to himself, ultimately it's not bad what I did, he hadn't thought about it before but seeing the products before his eyes, he got into the game and began to give birth to Max Valentin, this character who actually deliberately induced doubt in the text even though he had never seen the film before. You're talking to me about Agen, something, something, I think that the different theses, solutions, directions that are developed as the enigmas progress, he himself hadn't seen them. For me there are only the solutions that he has and which are written in his hand, it is undeniable, he only had that in mind. And then he said to himself, damn, guys are capable of finding that, wow! and he said I did it on purpose, it's my will, Max Valentin I had planned everything but you think well my dear friend. This is what happened.