(Q - Blackbeard: what do you think we players should do to get on the path to the necessary fabulous trigger?)
MB : that's not a bad question, a bit broad but not bad! What I think, if I try to follow what's happening, well I'm not everything, there are hours and hours of vocals in which I obviously don't participate, but from what I can read and what that I can hear when I interact with you live, I have the impression, I have the sensation that there is an immense permanent debate, on what I can know or not know, understand or not understand, to mean or not to mean, to imply or not to imply and at some point I say to myself but if I snap tomorrow, ultimately you will be super comfortable because you will have more than the elements that you have been communicated, which you will seek for good.
And sometimes I have the impression that the exchanges that we can have, and the fact that many consider important, perhaps with good reason and once again, I will not allow myself to judge or criticize, but that many feel they have to peel, analyze, dissect, put under the microscope, each element of syntax, each word that I may have used, etc., I think that this completely dilutes the energy which should, in my opinion, be devoted to solving puzzles.
I don't try to tell stories, if I use terms, well I have my vocabulary, everyone speaks as they are used to it
do, expresses himself as he usually does, but I never try on purpose, apart from once when I did it in a writing here on discord, quite a while ago, but otherwise I never try to induce a subliminal element into any of my
By the way, I'm not trying to give a hidden or second-degree clue.
I express myself with my own words and for example, the most recent example is the day I said we have to change gear, changing gear means when we attack a hill and well you change gear you pedal faster and move slower, but that allows you to spend fewer calories and less effort and the opposite, when you attack the descent that's what that means, that means we change speed, we change gear, we operate differently, we adapt to the terrain and so that has been interpreted in lots of ways, if he says that it means we are going up, the other no well no it's that we're going down, I never wanted to say that.
So to really answer this question, I think the best thing would be to say if we accept what I can say, if we say well ok we accept what Becker says, let's go, we'll go what, we don't go through each of the comments, we say well ok, we dismantle a certain number of diktats, we talk about the keys of passage, talk about the remainders, we talk about all that, they dismantle them for us, so we have to that we are a little less focused on that, so we take up the enigmas, what do we understand, where are we going, where we come from, that's what I think it's really the thing I'm waiting for, but which is already happening, I can already see it clearly but I'm waiting for it to become even more contagious and for everyone to focus on the puzzles and not on the analysis of the madits, the analysis of the middays, the analysis from midnight and the analysis of what you want what.
This is still a considerable dispersion of energy, a huge waste of energy.
MB : that's not a bad question, a bit broad but not bad! What I think, if I try to follow what's happening, well I'm not everything, there are hours and hours of vocals in which I obviously don't participate, but from what I can read and what that I can hear when I interact with you live, I have the impression, I have the sensation that there is an immense permanent debate, on what I can know or not know, understand or not understand, to mean or not to mean, to imply or not to imply and at some point I say to myself but if I snap tomorrow, ultimately you will be super comfortable because you will have more than the elements that you have been communicated, which you will seek for good.
And sometimes I have the impression that the exchanges that we can have, and the fact that many consider important, perhaps with good reason and once again, I will not allow myself to judge or criticize, but that many feel they have to peel, analyze, dissect, put under the microscope, each element of syntax, each word that I may have used, etc., I think that this completely dilutes the energy which should, in my opinion, be devoted to solving puzzles.
I don't try to tell stories, if I use terms, well I have my vocabulary, everyone speaks as they are used to it
do, expresses himself as he usually does, but I never try on purpose, apart from once when I did it in a writing here on discord, quite a while ago, but otherwise I never try to induce a subliminal element into any of my
By the way, I'm not trying to give a hidden or second-degree clue.
I express myself with my own words and for example, the most recent example is the day I said we have to change gear, changing gear means when we attack a hill and well you change gear you pedal faster and move slower, but that allows you to spend fewer calories and less effort and the opposite, when you attack the descent that's what that means, that means we change speed, we change gear, we operate differently, we adapt to the terrain and so that has been interpreted in lots of ways, if he says that it means we are going up, the other no well no it's that we're going down, I never wanted to say that.
So to really answer this question, I think the best thing would be to say if we accept what I can say, if we say well ok we accept what Becker says, let's go, we'll go what, we don't go through each of the comments, we say well ok, we dismantle a certain number of diktats, we talk about the keys of passage, talk about the remainders, we talk about all that, they dismantle them for us, so we have to that we are a little less focused on that, so we take up the enigmas, what do we understand, where are we going, where we come from, that's what I think it's really the thing I'm waiting for, but which is already happening, I can already see it clearly but I'm waiting for it to become even more contagious and for everyone to focus on the puzzles and not on the analysis of the madits, the analysis of the middays, the analysis from midnight and the analysis of what you want what.
This is still a considerable dispersion of energy, a huge waste of energy.