
(Q – Gringos: none commonly accepted that calls on French literature)
(Q – bioposis: I understand what Gringos is saying, literary aspect, chosen words and I admit that this is one of the questions I wanted to ask MB this evening, I have never seen , read, but not read everything, with this approach, of interpretation of chosen words, some for the atmosphere, some for the heart of the enigma, I have never seen this approach in any enigma and that appeals to me when Michel says that he saw 9 solutions, then pieces, not all assembled, but never seen this literary aspect)
(Q – Gringos: maybe for the SE, no more leftovers….)
(Q – bioposis: no, no, MB said that SE is not the literary side)
(Q – bioposis: I understand what Gringos is saying, literary aspect, chosen words and I admit that this is one of the questions I wanted to ask MB this evening, I have never seen , read, but not read everything, with this approach, of interpretation of chosen words, some for the atmosphere, some for the heart of the enigma, I have never seen this approach in any enigma and that appeals to me when Michel says that he saw 9 solutions, then pieces, not all assembled, but never seen this literary aspect)
(Q – Gringos: maybe for the SE, no more leftovers….)
(Q – bioposis: no, no, MB said that SE is not the literary side)